These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8531882)

  • 21. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
    Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of pixel resolution on texture features of breast masses in mammograms.
    Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM; Ayres FJ; Nandi AK
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 19756865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.
    Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Lam KL; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):549-67. PubMed ID: 9080535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms.
    Li L; Qian W; Clarke LP
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Nov; 4(11):724-31. PubMed ID: 9365751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
    Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
    Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
    Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A wavelet-based algorithm for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Méndez AJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1294-305. PubMed ID: 10435531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.
    Chan HP; Lo SC; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1555-67. PubMed ID: 8551980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast mass classification on mammograms using radial local ternary patterns.
    Muramatsu C; Hara T; Endo T; Fujita H
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 May; 72():43-53. PubMed ID: 27015322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer aided detection of masses in mammography using subregion Hotelling observers.
    Baydush AH; Catarious DM; Abbey CK; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1781-7. PubMed ID: 12906196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
    Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characterization of Architectural Distortion in Mammograms Based on Texture Analysis Using Support Vector Machine Classifier with Clinical Evaluation.
    Kamra A; Jain VK; Singh S; Mittal S
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 26138756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical textural features for detection of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms.
    Kim JK; Park HW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Mar; 18(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10363701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computerized detection of breast masses in digitized mammograms.
    Varela C; Tahoces PG; Méndez AJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Feb; 37(2):214-26. PubMed ID: 16620805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of masses based on asymmetric regions of digital bilateral mammograms using spatial description with variogram and cross-variogram functions.
    Ericeira DR; Silva AC; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Sep; 43(8):987-99. PubMed ID: 23816171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Oct; 19(10):1032-43. PubMed ID: 11131493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative analysis of breast cancer detection in mammograms and thermograms.
    Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Feb; 60(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 25720034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using multiscale texture and density features for near-term breast cancer risk analysis.
    Sun W; Tseng TL; Qian W; Zhang J; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Lure F; Yu H; Zhou S
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2853-62. PubMed ID: 26127038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1455-65. PubMed ID: 11488579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.