These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Role of practice and stimulus-onset-asynchrony in modulating effects of stimulus repetition, category relation, and response compatibility in the Eriksen flanker task. Zhang H Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1087-96. PubMed ID: 9172226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the relations between crowding and visual masking. Huckauf A; Heller D Percept Psychophys; 2004 May; 66(4):584-95. PubMed ID: 15311658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual organization at attended and unattended locations. Han S; Humphreys GW Sci China C Life Sci; 2005 Apr; 48(2):106-16. PubMed ID: 15986883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual grouping of objects occupied by target and flankers affects target-flanker interference. Luo C; Proctor RW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 26404531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification. Chanceaux M; Mathôt S; Grainger J J Vis; 2014 Nov; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 25384390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions. Miller J Percept Psychophys; 1991 Mar; 49(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 2011464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flanker compatibility effects in patients with Parkinson's disease: impact of target onset delay and trial-by-trial stimulus variation. Cagigas XE; Filoteo JV; Stricker JL; Rilling LM; Friedrich FJ Brain Cogn; 2007 Apr; 63(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 17049703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How color, regularity, and good Gestalt determine backward masking. Sayim B; Manassi M; Herzog M J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24944237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The negative compatibility effect with nonmasking flankers: a case for mask-triggered inhibition hypothesis. Jaśkowski P Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):765-77. PubMed ID: 18226925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field? Snow JC; Mattingley JB Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Disentangling stimulus and response compatibility as potential sources of backward crosstalk. Rieger T; Miller J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3415-3431. PubMed ID: 32529571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supercrowding: weakly masking a target expands the range of crowding. Vickery TJ; Shim WM; Chakravarthi R; Jiang YV; Luedeman R J Vis; 2009 Feb; 9(2):12.1-15. PubMed ID: 19271922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]