244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8532707)
1. Multiparameter flow cytometric DNA analysis of effusions: a prospective study of 36 cases compared with routine cytology and immunohistochemistry.
Joseph MG; Banerjee D; Harris P; Gibson S; McFadden RG
Mod Pathol; 1995 Aug; 8(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 8532707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Malignant mesothelioma: immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy analysis as methods to differentiate mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation and adenocarcinoma in pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Friedman MT; Gentile P; Tarectecan A; Fuchs A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Oct; 120(10):959-66. PubMed ID: 12046609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image analysis and flow cytometric DNA studies of benign and malignant body cavity fluids: reappraisal of the role of current methods in the differential diagnosis of reactive versus malignant conditions.
Lazcano O; Chen LM; Tsai C; Li CY; Katzmann JA; Sebo TJ; Kimlinger TK; Baker J
Mod Pathol; 2000 Jul; 13(7):788-96. PubMed ID: 10912939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image cytometry: an aid for cytological diagnosis of pleural effusions.
Osterheld MC; Liette C; Anca M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15690335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of flow cytometric immunophenotyping and DNA analysis for detection of malignant cells in serosal cavity fluids.
Sayed DM; el-Attar MM; Hussein AA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jul; 37(7):498-504. PubMed ID: 19217060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA flow cytometry of pleural effusions. Comparison with pathology for the diagnosis of malignancy.
Evans DA; Thornthwaite JT; Ng AB; Sugarbaker EV
Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Mar; 5(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 6846965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of CDKN2A deletion as a diagnostic marker for malignant mesothelioma in body cavity effusions.
Illei PB; Ladanyi M; Rusch VW; Zakowski MF
Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 12589646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytology, immunopathology and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Croonen AM; van der Valk P; Herman CJ; Lindeman J
Lab Invest; 1988 Jun; 58(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 3288807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of tumor cells in body cavity fluids by flow cytometric and immunocytochemical analysis.
Krishan A; Ganjei-Azar P; Jorda M; Hamelik RM; Reis IM; Nadji M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Aug; 34(8):528-41. PubMed ID: 16850481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of nucleolar organiser regions and DNA flow cytometry in the evaluation of pleural effusion.
Huang MS; Tsai MS; Hwang JJ; Wang TH
Thorax; 1994 Nov; 49(11):1152-6. PubMed ID: 7831633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction by image and flow cytometry in breast cancer fine-needle cytopunctures.
Spyratos F; Briffod M
Mod Pathol; 1997 Jun; 10(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 9195572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 9p21 Deletion in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in serous effusions additional to immunocytochemistry, DNA-ICM, and AgNOR analysis.
Onofre FB; Onofre AS; Pomjanski N; Buckstegge B; Grote HJ; Böcking A
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 18306350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of DNA flow cytometry and image cytometry on effusion fluid.
Saha I; Dey P; Vhora H; Nijhawan R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10649516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scoring system for differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma and reactive mesothelial cells on cytology specimens.
Kimura N; Dota K; Araya Y; Ishidate T; Ishizaka M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Dec; 37(12):885-90. PubMed ID: 19572412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An improved flow cytometric assay for detection and discrimination between malignant cells and atypical mesothelial cells, in serous cavity effusions.
Kentrou NA; Tsagarakis NJ; Tzanetou K; Damala M; Papadimitriou KA; Skoumi D; Stratigaki A; Anagnostopoulos NI; Malamou-Lada E; Athanassiadou P; Paterakis G
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2011 Sep; 80(5):324-34. PubMed ID: 21695775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interphase nucleolar organizer regions in the evaluation of serosal cavity effusions.
Carrillo R; Sneige N; el-Naggar AK
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 8191825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-tube triple staining method for flow cytometric analysis of DNA ploidy and phenotypic heterogeneity of human solid tumors using single laser excitation.
Corver WE; Bonsing BA; Abeln EC; Vlak-Theil PM; Cornelisse CJ; Fleuren GJ
Cytometry; 1996 Dec; 25(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 8946143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative analysis of integrin expression in effusions using flow cytometric immunophenotyping.
Sigstad E; Dong HP; Nielsen S; Berner A; Davidson B; Risberg B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Nov; 33(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 16240402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of DNA flow cytometric analysis of body cavity fluids with conventional cytology.
Lima CE; Mizushima Y; Masuda S; Kitagawa M
In Vivo; 1994; 8(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 7803718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Her2/neu analysis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas: comparison of immunohistochemistry and multiparameter DNA flow cytometry.
Leers MP; Hoop JG; Nap M
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(2A):999-1006. PubMed ID: 12820338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
