These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8533069)
1. [Results of a study of quality control of diagnostic ultrasound equipment]. Kollmann C Ultraschall Med; 1995 Oct; 16(5):206-9. PubMed ID: 8533069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment. Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Functional properties of diagnostic ultrasound instruments. A concept of trial building blocks for implementing quality assurance]. Trier HG Ultraschall Med; 1994 Oct; 15(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 7801092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Quality assurance in ultrasound diagnostic equipment in West Germany. Experiences with current regulations]. Trier HG Ultraschall Med; 1985 Oct; 6(5):255-64. PubMed ID: 3909397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aspects of the design of performance measuring test objects. McCarty K; Stewart W Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():185-9. PubMed ID: 6400238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Criteria and scheduling of quality control of B-mode and doppler ultrasonography equipment. Balbis S; Meloni T; Tofani S; Zenone F; Nucera D; Guiot C J Clin Ultrasound; 2012; 40(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 22359401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Quality assurance for diagnostic ultrasonic equipment in A- and B-mode in ophthalmology (author's transl)]. Trier HG Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1982 Jan; 180(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 7077985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of a new, portable ultrasound system in routine clinical use]. Pieckenpack A; Klebl F; Dorenbeck U; Schölmerich J; Lock G; Schlottmann K Rofo; 2002 Mar; 174(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 11885014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A possible quality control protocol for Doppler ultrasound for organizational time optimization. Di Nallo AM; Strigari L; Benassi M J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Sep; 25(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 17167978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Experiences in the testing of standard data on roentgen diagnostic equipment]. Klimpel H Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):105-8. PubMed ID: 4001772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Simple extension of an ultrasound B image device to a cw duplex scanner for carotid artery studies]. Widder B Ultraschall Med; 1985 Oct; 6(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 2934815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Thermal effects of ultrasound]. Koch C Ultraschall Med; 2001 Jun; 22(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 11484447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Training and quality assurance in ultrasound diagnosis]. Zweifel HJ; Schöb W Ultraschall Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 9417600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic error using ultrasound. Potential risks caused by deficient quality assurance by the manufacturer]. Schwing C Fortschr Med; 1985 Apr; 103(14):82-3. PubMed ID: 3888802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Measuring the image quality of ultrasound B scanners]. Leitgeb N; Schuy S Ultraschall Med; 1984 Feb; 5(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 6710118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality control in ultrasonography]. Meuwly JY Ther Umsch; 1997 Jan; 54(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9064797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A test object for quality control of the instrument for doppler (duplex) ultrasonography, based on the Draft IEC 61685 Standard]. Kollmann C; Bezemer RA; Fredfeldt KE; Schaarschmidt UG; Teirlinck CJ Ultraschall Med; 1999 Dec; 20(6):248-57. PubMed ID: 10670070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]