These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8533069)

  • 41. How perfect are you with defective probes? Information on the results of the mini-trial on technical quality assurance during the "Ultraschall 2012" conference in Davos.
    Rosenfeld E; Jenderka KV; Kopp A; Keim V
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 23558398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A review of two alternative ultrasound quality assurance programmes.
    Dudley NJ; Griffith K; Houldsworth G; Holloway M; Dunn MA
    Eur J Ultrasound; 2001 Mar; 12(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 11423248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Towards a protocol for measurement of maximum spatial peak temporal average acoustic intensity from diagnostic B mode ultrasound scanners in the field.
    Henderson J; Jago JR; Willson K; Whittingham TA
    Phys Med Biol; 1993 Nov; 38(11):1611-21. PubMed ID: 8272436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quality control in ultrasound studies on atherosclerosis.
    Berglund GL; Riley WA; Barnes RW; Furberg CD
    J Intern Med; 1994 Nov; 236(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 7964437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Performance survey of ultrasound instrumentation and feasibility of routine monitoring.
    Chirstensen SL; Carson PL
    Radiology; 1977 Feb; 122(2):449-54. PubMed ID: 834894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Ultrasound Probe Acceptance Testing Using the In-Air Reverberation Pattern.
    Dudley NJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1475-1482. PubMed ID: 30940416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How to Interpret the Ultrasound Output Display Standard for Diagnostic Ultrasound Devices: Version 3.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Dec; 38(12):3101-3105. PubMed ID: 31736131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Use of systems approach to solving regional problems of renewal of the stock of ultrasound scanners (the case of the Smolensk Region)].
    Demin VA; Miliagin VA; Alekseenko AA
    Med Tekh; 2001; (1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11244855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A routine procedure for monitoring clinical ultrasound equipment.
    Goldstein A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1975 Dec; 3(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 829530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Ultrasound Image Optimization ("Knobology"): B-Mode.
    Zander D; Hüske S; Hoffmann B; Cui XW; Dong Y; Lim A; Jenssen C; Löwe A; Koch JBH; Dietrich CF
    Ultrasound Int Open; 2020 Jun; 6(1):E14-E24. PubMed ID: 32885137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Statements, recommendations and guidelines for diagnostic equipment. Overview.
    Nyborg WL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15 Suppl 1():85-6. PubMed ID: 2672520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A proposed enhancement to the in air sensitivity test for ultrasound quality assurance.
    Dudley NJ
    Phys Med; 2018 Sep; 53():1-3. PubMed ID: 30241743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The suitability of tissue mimicking phantoms for equipment calibration.
    Perkins AC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(1):193-4. PubMed ID: 3892814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Quality of sonography in internal medicine].
    Bönhof JA; Linhart P
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1986 Aug; 111(33):1227-9. PubMed ID: 3527639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quality assurance of ultrasound test objects.
    Brannigan PD; Bell TK
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Jul; 63(751):584. PubMed ID: 2202482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Vaginal ultrasound for the practicing clinician. Equipment selection.
    Peisner DB
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Mar; 39(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 8635296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. How and why are ultrasonic scanners chosen?
    Halliwell M; Wells PN
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1076-7. PubMed ID: 1742596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Conclusions regarding biological effects of ultrasound for diagnostically relevant exposures.
    Frizzell LA
    J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Jan; 13(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 7636960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. NCRP/AIUM uniform absorption models.
    Carstensen EL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15 Suppl 1():31-4. PubMed ID: 2672510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The adaptation of commercially available radio control equipment to behavior therapy.
    Coleman R; Toth E
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1970; 3(3):221-2. PubMed ID: 16795261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.