134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8533180)
1. A critical evaluation of the use of the Schiller test in selecting blocks from the uterine cervix in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia.
Heatley MK
Ulster Med J; 1995 Oct; 64(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8533180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the diagnosis in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
Myllynen L; Karjalainen O
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6732157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: are hysterectomy specimens sampled appropriately?
Heatley M
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Apr; 48(4):323-4. PubMed ID: 7615850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A critical evaluation of the Schiller test in patients before conization.
Rubio CA; Thomassen P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 125(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 775993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Morphological observation of cone biopsy and hysterectomy specimens of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Chen XD; Shi HY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 43(6):429-32. PubMed ID: 19035137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Avoiding conization for inadequate colposcopy. Suggestions for conservative therapy.
Yandell RB; Hannigan EV; Dinh TV; Buchanan VS
J Reprod Med; 1996 Mar; 41(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 8778408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement.
Livasy CA; Maygarden SJ; Rajaratnam CT; Novotny DB
Mod Pathol; 1999 Mar; 12(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10102607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The appropriateness of examining the entire cervix histologically in hysterectomy specimens from women with a previous history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or dyskaryosis.
Greene A; Heatley MK
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11215286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
Ramirez EJ; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone biopsy and hysterectomy in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jones HW
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Mar; 9(1):221-36. PubMed ID: 7600728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of High-Grade Histopathology Diagnosed by Cervical Conization in Endocervical Curettage Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Case-Control Study.
Cong Q; Xiao J; Tao X; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 32324695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Secondary excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an evaluation of two treatment methods.
Bowring J; Tulloch I; Phadnis SV; Young MP; Evans H; Walker P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 20604658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.
Kumar N; Bongiovanni M; Molliet MJ; Pelte MF; Egger JF; Pache JC
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 18522633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical study on cervix biopsy guided by colposcopy in diagnosis of cervical diseases in pregnant women].
Wang T; Wu YM; Song F; Zhu L; Li BZ; Hao X; Kong WM; Duan W; Fan L; Zhang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):497-500. PubMed ID: 21029600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
