These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8533752)

  • 1. Optimal sampling strategies for two-stage studies.
    Reilly M
    Am J Epidemiol; 1996 Jan; 143(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 8533752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genomewide association studies.
    Müller HH; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):844-52. PubMed ID: 17549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal designs of two-stage studies for estimation of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value.
    McNamee R
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3609-25. PubMed ID: 12436459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-stage sampling in genetic epidemiology.
    Whittemore AS; Halpern J
    Stat Med; 1997 Jan 15-Feb 15; 16(1-3):153-67. PubMed ID: 9004389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical strategies for operationalizing optimal allocation in stratified cluster-based outcome-dependent sampling designs.
    Sauer S; Hedt-Gauthier B; Haneuse S
    Stat Med; 2023 Mar; 42(7):917-935. PubMed ID: 36650619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-wave two-phase outcome-dependent sampling designs, with applications to longitudinal binary data.
    Tao R; Mercaldo ND; Haneuse S; Maronge JM; Rathouz PJ; Heagerty PJ; Schildcrout JS
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(8):1863-1876. PubMed ID: 33442883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive sampling in two-phase designs: a biomarker study for progression in arthritis.
    McIsaac MA; Cook RJ
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(21):2899-912. PubMed ID: 25951124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of efficient designs for observational epidemiologic studies.
    Kalish LA; Begg CB
    Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):145-67. PubMed ID: 3567303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal robust two-stage designs for genome-wide association studies.
    Nguyen TT; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 73(Pt 6):638-51. PubMed ID: 19839987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal sampling allocation for outcome-dependent designs in cluster-correlated data settings.
    Rivera-Rodriguez C; Haneuse S; Sauer S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2400-2414. PubMed ID: 36039539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Search for efficient complete and planned missing data designs for analysis of change.
    Wu W; Jia F; Rhemtulla M; Little TD
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):1047-61. PubMed ID: 26170055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal restricted two-stage designs.
    Case LD; Morgan TM; Davis CE
    Control Clin Trials; 1987 Jun; 8(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 3608508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient design of cluster randomized and multicentre trials with unknown intraclass correlation.
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):540-56. PubMed ID: 21937473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weighing gains and losses in criterion validity studies with test-based enrollment.
    Reichenheim ME
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Oct; 56(10):983-8. PubMed ID: 14568630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paradigms for adaptive statistical information designs: practical experiences and strategies.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM; O'Neill R
    Stat Med; 2012 Nov; 31(25):3011-23. PubMed ID: 22927234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal design and efficiency of two-phase case-control studies with error-prone and error-free exposure measures.
    McNamee R
    Biostatistics; 2005 Oct; 6(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 15860543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the efficiency of two-stage response-adaptive designs.
    Dette H; Bornkamp B; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(10):1646-60. PubMed ID: 22865374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Designs and analysis of two-stage studies.
    Zhao LP; Lipsitz S
    Stat Med; 1992 Apr; 11(6):769-82. PubMed ID: 1594816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient study designs to assess the accuracy of screening tests.
    Irwig L; Glasziou PP; Berry G; Chock C; Mock P; Simpson JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Oct; 140(8):759-69. PubMed ID: 7942777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.
    Schisterman EF; Vexler A; Mumford SL; Perkins NJ
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(5):597-613. PubMed ID: 20049693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.