These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8533842)

  • 1. Use of decision analysis to evaluate patients' choices of diagnostic prenatal test.
    Verp MS; Heckerling PS
    Am J Med Genet; 1995 Sep; 58(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 8533842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preferences of pregnant women for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal testing: comparison of patients' choices and those of a decision-analytic model.
    Heckerling PS; Verp MS; Hadro TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1994 Nov; 47(11):1215-28. PubMed ID: 7722557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prenatal diagnosis in twin gestations: a comparison between second-trimester amniocentesis and first-trimester chorionic villus sampling.
    Wapner RJ; Johnson A; Davis G; Urban A; Morgan P; Jackson L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 82(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8515925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of physician preferences in the choice of amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal genetic testing.
    Heckerling PS; Verp MS; Albert N
    Genet Test; 1998; 2(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 10464598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Second-trimester amniocentesis vs. chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis in multiple gestations.
    Antsaklis A; Souka AP; Daskalakis G; Kavalakis Y; Michalas S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 20(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 12423485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures 2005.
    Evans MI; Wapner RJ
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 29(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 16104671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter most.
    Kuppermann M; Feeny D; Gates E; Posner SF; Blumberg B; Washington AE
    Prenat Diagn; 1999 Aug; 19(8):711-6. PubMed ID: 10451513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prenatal testing for limb reduction defects. How patients' views affect their choice of CVS.
    Heckerling PS; Verp MS; Albert N
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Feb; 42(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 9058348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychological distress before and after prenatal invasive karyotyping.
    Cederholm M; Sjödén PO; Axelsson O
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Jun; 80(6):539-45. PubMed ID: 11380290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital.
    Rueangchainikhom W; Sarapak S; Orungrote N
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jan; 91(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18386536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parental decision following prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormality.
    Verp MS; Bombard AT; Simpson JL; Elias S
    Am J Med Genet; 1988 Mar; 29(3):613-22. PubMed ID: 3377004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal anomalies: current opinion on amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling.
    Hod M; Royburt M; Neri A; Friedman S; Kaplan B; Ovadia J
    Isr J Med Sci; 1994 Sep; 30(9):714-6. PubMed ID: 8088987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prenatal diagnosis: choices women make about pursuing testing and acting on abnormal results.
    Pryde PG; Drugan A; Johnson MP; Isada NB; Evans MI
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):469-509. PubMed ID: 11643167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early prenatal diagnosis: the first 100 cases of chorionic villus sampling at Ochsner Foundation Hospital.
    Robichaux AG; Superneau DW; Merritt CR; Varela M
    J La State Med Soc; 1993 Jul; 145(7):313-4. PubMed ID: 8228538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient or physician preferences for decision analysis: the prenatal genetic testing decision.
    Heckerling PS; Verp MS; Albert N
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 9917022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 1. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down syndrome. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.
    Dick PT
    CMAJ; 1996 Feb; 154(4):465-79. PubMed ID: 8630836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The choices women make about prenatal diagnosis.
    Evans MI; Pryde PG; Evans WJ; Johnson MP
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):70-80. PubMed ID: 11653025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A conceptual explanation of risk-reduction behavior and intervention development.
    Cox CL; Sullivan JA; Roghmann KJ
    Nurs Res; 1984; 33(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 6563535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uptake of invasive prenatal diagnostic tests in women after detection of soft markers for chromosomal abnormality on ultrasonographic evaluation.
    Sharda S; Phadke SR
    J Perinatol; 2007 Sep; 27(9):550-5. PubMed ID: 17611609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenatal diagnosis: chances, choices.
    Roberts SF
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 9379162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.