These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8534439)

  • 1. Screening for glaucoma in a Brisbane general practice--the role of tonometry.
    Jackson C; Bullock J; Pitt M; Keogh J; Glasson W; Hirst L
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1995 Aug; 23(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 8534439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann tonometer, I-care pro, Tonopen XL, and Schiotz tonometer in patients after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
    Ohana O; Varssano D; Shemesh G
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 65(7):579-583. PubMed ID: 28724814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of the difference in intraocular pressure between the sitting and lying body positions in healthy subjects: direct comparison of the Icare Pro with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Pneumatonometer and Tonopen XL.
    Barkana Y; Gutfreund S
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014; 42(7):608-14. PubMed ID: 24299102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Perkins, Tono-Pen and Schiøtz tonometers in paediatric patients under general anaesthesia.
    Gharaei H; Kargozar A; Raygan F; Daneshvar R
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 19161112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intraocular tonometry using three different non-invasive tonometers in children.
    Lasseck J; Jehle T; Feltgen N; Lagrèze WA
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Oct; 246(10):1463-6. PubMed ID: 18553097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.
    dos Santos MG; Makk S; Berghold A; Eckhardt M; Haas A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2260-3. PubMed ID: 9855157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
    Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can the Tono-Pen replace the Schiøtz tonometer in general practice?
    Christoffersen T; Holtedahl K; Ringberg U; Fors T
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 1998 Dec; 16(4):238-41. PubMed ID: 9932318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Goldmann applanation versus hand-applanation and .schiötz indentation tonometry.
    Krieglstein GK; Waller WK
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1975; 194(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1079117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
    Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Portable tonometers: a clinical comparison of applanation and indentation devices.
    Chiara GF; Semes LP; Potter JW; Cutter GR; Tucker WR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 2703651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical comparison of the measurement of the IOP with the ocular blood flow tonometer, the Tonopen XL and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Bafa M; Lambrinakis I; Dayan M; Birch M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2001 Feb; 79(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11167279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICARE and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry*.
    van der Jagt LH; Jansonius NM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 16101949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diaton tonometry: an assessment of validity and preference against Goldmann tonometry.
    Doherty MD; Carrim ZI; O'Neill DP
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e171-5. PubMed ID: 21718408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Intraocular pressure measurement during the day and night for glaucoma patients and normal controls using Goldmann and Perkins applanation tonometry].
    Wozniak K; Köller AU; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pillunat LE
    Ophthalmologe; 2006 Dec; 103(12):1027-31. PubMed ID: 17048019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical discrepancy between Schiötz and Perkins Tonometry in juvenile glaucoma].
    Dietlein TS; Jacobi PC; Krieglstein GK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996 Nov; 209(5):299-303; discussion 298. PubMed ID: 9044978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of accuracy of measuring intraocular pressure by handheld non-contact applanation tonometer].
    Chen X; Peng D; Zhou W; Zhong Y
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 1995 Jun; 11(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 9208659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.