These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8534444)

  • 1. Comparison of stereo optic disc photographs from the Nidek 3-Dx and Zeiss retinal cameras.
    Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1995 Aug; 23(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 8534444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variance owing to observer, repeat imaging, and fundus camera type on cup-to-disc ratio estimates by stereo planimetry.
    Kwon YH; Adix M; Zimmerman MB; Piette S; Greenlee EC; Alward WL; Abràmoff MD
    J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 19365196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative optic cup depth assessments using three stereo photograph viewing methods.
    Boes DA; Spaeth GL; Mills RP; Smith M; Nicholl JE; Clifton BC
    J Glaucoma; 1996 Feb; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8795728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma.
    Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; Morgan W; Tay-Kearney ML; Jitskaia L
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 10529928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Nidek 3Dx and Donaldson simultaneous stereoscopic disk photography.
    Greenfield DS; Zacharia P; Schuman JS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1993 Dec; 116(6):741-7. PubMed ID: 8250078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resolution of nidek 3-dx, zeiss, canon, and topcon fundus cameras.
    Boes DA; Clifton BC; Mills RP
    J Glaucoma; 1994; 3(3):190-200. PubMed ID: 19920596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for glaucoma with stereo disc photography.
    Schultz RO; Radius RL; Hartz AJ; Brown DB; Eytan ON; Ogawa GS; Kuhn E; Simons KB
    J Glaucoma; 1995 Jun; 4(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19920665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agreement between stereoscopic photographs, clinical assessment, Heidelberg retina tomograph and digital stereoscopic optic disc camera in estimating vertical cup:disc ratio.
    Jayasundera T; Danesh-Meyer HV; Donaldson M; Gamble G
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 15932529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3-D retinal surface inference: stereo or monocular fundus camera?
    Martinello M; Favaro P; Muyo Nieto GD; Harvey AR; Grisan E; Scarpa F; Ruggeri A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():896-9. PubMed ID: 18002101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera.
    Parkin B; Shuttleworth G; Costen M; Davison C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Nov; 85(11):1347-51. PubMed ID: 11673304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optic disc drusen--a photographic study. II. Retinal nerve fibre layer photography.
    Mustonen E; Nieminen H
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1982 Dec; 60(6):859-72. PubMed ID: 7170931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation (GONE) project: the effect of monoscopic versus stereoscopic viewing conditions on optic nerve evaluation.
    Chan HH; Ong DN; Kong YX; O'Neill EC; Pandav SS; Coote MA; Crowston JG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 157(5):936-44. PubMed ID: 24508161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of digital and film stereo photography of the optic nerve in the evaluation of patients with glaucoma.
    Khouri AS; Szirth B; Realini T; Fechtner RD
    Telemed J E Health; 2006 Dec; 12(6):632-8. PubMed ID: 17250484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of photographic techniques and films used in stereophotogrammetry of the optic disk.
    Krohn MA; Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1979 Nov; 88(5):859-63. PubMed ID: 507165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of optic disc image assessment methods when examining serial photographs for glaucomatous progression.
    Barry CJ; Eikelboom R; Kanagasingam Y; Jitskaia L; Morgan W; House P; Cuypers M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 84(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 10611095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated segmentation of the optic disc from stereo color photographs using physiologically plausible features.
    Abràmoff MD; Alward WL; Greenlee EC; Shuba L; Kim CY; Fingert JH; Kwon YH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1665-73. PubMed ID: 17389498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements.
    Shuttleworth GN; Khong CH; Diamond JP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2000 Apr; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 10729299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between tomographic scanning evaluation and photographic measurement of the neuroretinal rim.
    Dichtl A; Jonas JB; Mardin CY
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1996 May; 121(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 8610792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy using a hand-held fundus camera.
    Yogesan K; Constable IJ; Barry CJ; Eikelboom RH; McAllister IL; Tay-Kearney ML
    Telemed J; 2000; 6(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 10957734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Twin-prism stereo-separator.
    Kottler MS; Rosenthal AR; Drance SM; Falconer DG; Peppers NA
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1976 Jan; 11(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 1247943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.