These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8535227)

  • 1. Phase III comparative trial using CHOP vs CIOP in the treatment of advanced intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Zinzani PL; Martelli M; Storti S; Musso M; Cantonetti M; Leone G; Cajozzo A; Papa G; Iannitto E; Perrotti A
    Leuk Lymphoma; 1995 Oct; 19(3-4):329-35. PubMed ID: 8535227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of CHOP versus CIOP in good prognosis younger patients with histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
    Burton C; Smith P; Vaughan-Hudson G; Qian W; Hoskin P; Cunningham D; Hancock B; Linch D
    Br J Haematol; 2005 Aug; 130(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16098067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anthracycline containing regimens in intermediate grade lymphoma. Italian Cooperative Study Group on Intermediate Grade Malignant Lymphoma.
    Zinzani PL; Tura S; Cajozzo A; Leone G; Papa G; Gentilini P; Rossi G; Aitini E; Mandelli F
    Leuk Lymphoma; 1993; 10 Suppl():39-41. PubMed ID: 8481669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term results of a multicentre randomised, comparative phase III trial of CHOP versus CNOP regimens in patients with intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Novantrone International Study Group.
    Bezwoda W; Rastogi RB; Erazo Valla A; Diaz-Maqueo JC; Pavlovsky S; Morioka H; Resegotti L; Rueckle H; Somoza N; Moreno-Nogueira JA
    Eur J Cancer; 1995 Jun; 31A(6):903-11. PubMed ID: 7646919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Fisher RI; Gaynor ER; Dahlberg S; Oken MM; Grogan TM; Mize EM; Glick JH; Coltman CA; Miller TP
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Apr; 328(14):1002-6. PubMed ID: 7680764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical comparison of CHO regimen versus CHOP regimen for treatment of patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].
    Yuan ZY; Xu RH; He YJ; Guan ZZ
    Ai Zheng; 2003 Apr; 22(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 12703996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study.
    Fisher RI; Gaynor ER; Dahlberg S; Oken MM; Grogan TM; Mize EM; Glick JH; Coltman CA; Miller TP
    Ann Oncol; 1994; 5 Suppl 2():91-5. PubMed ID: 7515652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of amifostine on toxicity of CHOP in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a phase II study.
    Späth-Schwalbe E; Lange C; Genvresse I; Krüger L; Eucker J; Schweigert M; Sezer O; Budach V; Possinger K
    Anticancer Drugs; 2002 Apr; 13(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 11984085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epirubicin (CEOP-Bleo) versus idaurubicin (CIOP-Bleo) in the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: dose escalation studies.
    Avilés A; Nambo MJ; Talavera A; Garcia EL; Huerta-Guzman J; Díaz Maqueo JC
    Anticancer Drugs; 1997 Nov; 8(10):937-42. PubMed ID: 9436636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized trial comparing intensified CNOP vs. CHOP in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Pangalis GA; Vassilakopoulos TP; Michalis E; Roussou P; Vrakidou E; Repousis P; Angelopoulou MK; Siakantaris MP; Korantzis J; Symeonidis A; Grigorakis V; Stefanoudakis E; Stamatellou M; Bourantas KL; Kalmantis T; Christopoulos G; Kokkinis G; Mihalakeas I; Papayiannis A;
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2003 Apr; 44(4):635-44. PubMed ID: 12769340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a second-generation combination chemotherapeutic regimen (m-BACOD) with a standard regimen (CHOP) for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Gordon LI; Harrington D; Andersen J; Colgan J; Glick J; Neiman R; Mann R; Resnick GD; Barcos M; Gottlieb A
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Nov; 327(19):1342-9. PubMed ID: 1383819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of doxorubicin and mitoxantrone in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using CHOP versus CNOP chemotherapy.
    Sonneveld P; de Ridder M; van der Lelie H; Nieuwenhuis K; Schouten H; Mulder A; van Reijswoud I; Hop W; Lowenberg B
    J Clin Oncol; 1995 Oct; 13(10):2530-9. PubMed ID: 7595704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CHOP with high dose cyclophosphamide consolidation versus CHOP alone as initial therapy for advanced stage, indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.
    Pan D; Qin J; Farber C; O'Brien J; Filippa D; Portlock CS
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2003 Jun; 44(6):967-71. PubMed ID: 12854895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phase III comparative trial (m-BACOD v m-BNCOD) in the treatment of stage II to IV non-Hodgkin's lymphomas with intermediate- or high-grade histology.
    Gherlinzoni F; Guglielmi C; Mazza P; Amadori S; Mandelli F; Tura S
    Semin Oncol; 1990 Dec; 17(6 Suppl 10):3-8; discussion 8-9. PubMed ID: 1701924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CHOP is the standard regimen in patients > or = 70 years of age with intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group.
    Tirelli U; Errante D; Van Glabbeke M; Teodorovic I; Kluin-Nelemans JC; Thomas J; Bron D; Rosti G; Somers R; Zagonel V; Noordijk EM
    J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jan; 16(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 9440719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using CEOP versus CNOP.
    Economopoulos T; Dimopoulos MA; Mellou S; Pavlidis N; Samantas E; Nicolaides C; Tsatalas C; Papadopoulos A; Papageogriou E; Papasavvas P; Fountzilas G
    Eur J Haematol; 2002 Mar; 68(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 12068793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Survival of patients with aggressive non-hodgkin's lymphoma: no difference between first line treatment in a prospective randomised phase III clinical trial and first line treatment according to routine clinical practice].
    van Agthoven M; Wittebol S; Budel LM; Uyl-de Groot CA; Kramer MH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jan; 148(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 14753131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective comparison between CHOP-PVP and CHOP protocols for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Gan H; Zhang F; Lin Y
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2002 Jul; 24(4):397-9. PubMed ID: 12408775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Southwest oncology group clinical trials for intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.
    Fisher RI; Miller TP; Dana BW; Jones SE; Dahlberg S; Coltman CA
    Semin Hematol; 1987 Apr; 24(2 Suppl 1):21-5. PubMed ID: 2438778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of chemotherapy CHOP vs. CHOP/VIA in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study of 132 patients. The PETHEMA group. Program for Study and Therapeutics of malignant hemopathies. Spanish Association of Hematology and Hemotherapy].
    López-Guillermo A; García-Conde J; Alvarez-Carmona AM; León P; Maldonado J; Alcalá A; Zubizarreta A; Sancho-Tello R; Carbonell F; Contreras E; Besses C; Hernando A; Fontanillas M; Montserrat E
    Med Clin (Barc); 1998 May; 110(16):601-4. PubMed ID: 9656196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.