These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974. U.S US Statut Large; 1974; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled. Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Why HHS should reconsider its proposed exemption for social policy experiments. Abram MB; IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethical issues in headache research and management: report and recommendations of the ethics subcommittee of the International Headache Society. International Headache Society. Ethics Subcommittee Cephalalgia; 1998 Sep; 18(7):505-29. PubMed ID: 11645127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations. Gray BH IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Developing a Tri-Council code of conduct for research involving humans. Rolleston F; Armour C; Stipich N J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11655381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation. Ratnoff MF Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Proposal for a good clinical practice directive. European Commission Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Feb; No. 135():6-11. PubMed ID: 11657249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Bill of rights for research subjects. Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Guidance on Making Proposals to Conduct Gene Therapy Research on Human Subjects. Gene Therapy Advisory Committee (Great Britain) Gene Ther; 1994 Nov; 1(6):343-363 (inset). PubMed ID: 11644650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Ethics of Human Experimentation: Reinventing the Research Ethics Board: Proceedings of a National Workshop held in Ottawa, Ontario, March 5-6, 1995. National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada) NCBHR Commun; 1996; 7(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 11654527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]