These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Great Britain Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States. Stenger RL J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Priest JA Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Virgin births and sterile debates: anthropology and the new reproductive technologies. Shore C; Abrahams RG; Collier JF; Delaney C; Fox R; Frankenberg R; Lambert HS; Melhuus M; Schneider DM; Stolcke V; Wolfram S Curr Anthropol; 1992 Jun; 33(3):295-314. PubMed ID: 11659550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Council agrees response to Warnock report. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The regulation of assisted conception in England. Stern K Eur J Health Law; 1994; 1(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11654549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The British law on assisted reproduction: a liberal law by comparison with many other European laws. Sutton A Ethics Med; 1996; 12(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 11660744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The ethics of human manufacture. Krauthammer C New Repub; 1987 May; 196(18):17-21. PubMed ID: 11658978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Techniques of Assisted Reproduction: Act 35/1988. Spain Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Nov; No. 282():. PubMed ID: 12041504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Great Britain Halsburys Statut Engl G B; 1990 Nov; 38():105-61. PubMed ID: 12041434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Canada calls for moratorium on IVF technologies. Kondro W Lancet; 1995 Aug; 346(8971):367. PubMed ID: 11653127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intimations of life: extracorporeality and the law. Smith GP Gonzaga Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(2):395-424. PubMed ID: 11658788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee. Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted reproduction: a process ripe for regulation? A conference of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction. Jonsen AR; Macklin R; White GB Womens Health Issues; 1996; 6(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8672893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report. Deitch R Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies. American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3) Suppl. 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 11658710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal responses to some of the new developments in reproductive technologies. Part 1. Scott A Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2001; 7(2):28-37. PubMed ID: 11881688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rules and ethics concerning assisted procreation established by the government in Germany. Krebs D J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Mar; 13(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 11644839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]