These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8536742)
1. Standardization of bone mineral density measurements and the European multicentre studies. Osteaux M; Louis O Eur J Radiol; 1995 Sep; 20(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 8536742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recent developments in DXA. Quality of new DXA/MXA-devices for densitometry and morphometry. Felsenberg D; Gowin W; Diessel E; Armbrust S; Mews J Eur J Radiol; 1995 Sep; 20(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 8536744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardization of postero-anterior spine bone mineral density measurements. Committee for Standards in DXA. Eur J Radiol; 1995 Sep; 20(3):198-9. PubMed ID: 8536748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The European Spine Phantom--a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Kalender WA; Felsenberg D; Genant HK; Fischer M; Dequeker J; Reeve J Eur J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 20(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 7588873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Larcos G; Wahner HW J Nucl Med; 1991 Nov; 32(11):2101-6. PubMed ID: 1941145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Guglielmi G Eur J Radiol; 1995 Sep; 20(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 8536745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone mineral density at distal forearm can identify patients with osteoporosis at spine or femoral neck. Jones T; Davie MW Br J Rheumatol; 1998 May; 37(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 9651082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Kanis JA; McCloskey EV; Johansson H; Oden A; Melton LJ; Khaltaev N Bone; 2008 Mar; 42(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 18180210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur. Tothill P; Fenner JA; Reid DM Br J Radiol; 1995 Jun; 68(810):621-9. PubMed ID: 7627485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis of low bone mass in CKD-5D patients. Blomquist GA; Davenport DL; Mawad HW; Monier-Faugere MC; Malluche HH Clin Nephrol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 26587778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of routine thoracic and abdominal computed tomography scans for assessing bone mineral density and detecting osteoporosis. Marinova M; Edon B; Wolter K; Katsimbari B; Schild HH; Strunk HM Curr Med Res Opin; 2015; 31(10):1871-81. PubMed ID: 26308674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased bone mineral density in dual x-ray densitometry due to gluteal implants. Rivera M; Humeres P; González P Clin Nucl Med; 1999 Jan; 24(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 9890494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Peripheral and central measurements of bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with clinical risk factors for osteoporosis. Patel R; Blake GM; Fogelman I Calcif Tissue Int; 2007 Feb; 80(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17308990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss. Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice and its trouble spots in bone mineral measurement]. Hagino H Clin Calcium; 2004 Dec; 14(12):33-8. PubMed ID: 15577171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. European semi-anthropomorphic phantom for the cross-calibration of peripheral bone densitometers: assessment of precision accuracy and stability. Pearson J; Ruegsegger P; Dequeker J; Henley M; Bright J; Reeve J; Kalender W; Felsenberg D; Laval-Jeantet AM; Adams JE Bone Miner; 1994 Nov; 27(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 7711519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the proximal femur with morphologic data. Hübsch P; Kocanda H; Youssefzadeh S; Schneider B; Kainberger F; Seidl G; Kurtaran A; Gruber S Acta Radiol; 1992 Sep; 33(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 1389659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calcaneal ultrasonometry: response to treatment in comparison with dual x-ray absorptiometry measurements of the lumbar spine and femur. Rosenthall L; Caminis J; Tenehouse A Calcif Tissue Int; 1999 Mar; 64(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10024375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of femoral neck BMD evaluation obtained using Lunar DXA and QCT with asynchronous calibration from CT colonography. Pickhardt PJ; Bodeen G; Brett A; Brown JK; Binkley N J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24880495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur. Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]