These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8536744)

  • 21. Bone mineral density evaluation in osteoporosis: why yes and why not?
    Celi M; Rao C; Scialdoni A; Tempesta V; Gasbarra E; Pistillo P; Tarantino U
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2013 Oct; 25 Suppl 1():S47-9. PubMed ID: 24046042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The long-term performance of DXA bone densitometers.
    Wells J; Ryan PJ
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):737-9. PubMed ID: 11089465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Femur: DXA(QDR, DPX, XR)].
    Fukunaga M; Tomomitsu T
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Nov; 65 Suppl 9():159-62. PubMed ID: 18161101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Denoising images of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry using non-local means filters.
    Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Metwally MK; Hussain D; Park SJ; Shin JS; Han SM; Kim TS
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):395-412. PubMed ID: 29562584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bone densitometry of the forearm: comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Eckert P; Casez JP; Thiébaud D; Schnyder P; Burckhardt P
    Bone; 1996 Jun; 18(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 8805999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [A calibration phantom system for QCT bone mineral density determination].
    Yan Q; Yan L; Yang DZ; San HB; Yan ZF
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 May; 29(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 16124621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bone densitometry: current status and future prospects.
    Blake GM; Glüer CC; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70 Spec No():S177-86. PubMed ID: 9534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vertebral morphometry: a comparison of long-term precision of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography in normal and osteoporotic subjects.
    Rea JA; Chen MB; Li J; Marsh E; Fan B; Blake GM; Steiger P; Smith IG; Genant HK; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 11303717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
    Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Reginster JY; Deroisy R; Zegels B; Jupsin I; Albert A; Franchimont P
    Clin Rheumatol; 1995 Mar; 14(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 7789060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bone densitometry.
    Chun KJ
    Semin Nucl Med; 2011 May; 41(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 21440697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems.
    Svendsen OL; Marslew U; Hassager C; Christiansen C
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1992; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 1547807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
    Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Larcos G; Wahner HW
    J Nucl Med; 1991 Nov; 32(11):2101-6. PubMed ID: 1941145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
    Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A study of the long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometers and implications for the validity of the least-significant-change calculation.
    Hangartner TN
    Osteoporos Int; 2007 Apr; 18(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 17136486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bone mineral measurement of phalanges: comparison of radiographic absorptiometry and area dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Gulam M; Thornton MM; Hodsman AB; Holdsworth DW
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):586-91. PubMed ID: 10924590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. I: Studies in vitro at four centers.
    Eiken P; Bärenholdt O; Bjørn Jensen L; Gram J; Pors Nielsen S
    Bone; 1994; 15(6):667-70. PubMed ID: 7873295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices.
    Diessel E; Fuerst T; Njeh CF; Tylavsky F; Cauley J; Dockrell M; Genant HK
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2000 Aug; 89(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 10926643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Towards standardization of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm: a common region of interest (ROI) improves the comparability among DXA devices.
    Prevrhal S; Lu Y; Genant HK; Toschke JO; Shepherd JA
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 May; 76(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 15868279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.