These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. [Mammography in carcinoma of the breast. Radiological semeiotics]. Ascarelli AA; Bortolotti G Nunt Radiol; 1967 Sep; 33(9):1099-140. PubMed ID: 4302860 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. [The x-ray study of the breast by means of the isodense technic in the early diagnosis of malignant tumors]. Kretz J; Dobretsberger W J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1967 Nov; 48(11):658-9. PubMed ID: 5591641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Mammography in mass-screening]. Van Bekkum DW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1977 Dec; 121(50):2009-12. PubMed ID: 927579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The protocol and results of training nonradiologists to scan mammograms. Alcorn FS; O'Donnell E; Ackerman LV Radiology; 1971 Jun; 99(3):523-9. PubMed ID: 4397087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Comparative values of radiophosphorus accumulation test and mammography in the diagnosis of breast diseases]. Miclutia M; Holan T Radiobiol Radiother (Berl); 1974; 15(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 4431946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Feasibility of radiological screening for breast cancer. Asbury DL; Barker PG Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jul; 68(7):435-7. PubMed ID: 1236546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Increased radiation dose at mammography due to prolonged exposure, delayed processing, and increased film darkening. Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Chow S Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 1987598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. What's new in radiology: the mammography issue. Lester RG Tex Med; 1980 Jun; 76(6):43-4. PubMed ID: 7404425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Use of non-medical screeners and effect of low dose on film quality in a breast screening campaign. Hartley G Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jul; 68(7):437-8. PubMed ID: 1236547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Radiologic detection of breast cancer. Review and recommendations. Sadowsky NL; Kalisher L; White G; Ferrucci JT N Engl J Med; 1976 Feb; 294(7):370-3. PubMed ID: 1246289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Modern mammography. Melville RP; Burch W Aust Fam Physician; 1987 Oct; 16(10):1478, 1480, 1484. PubMed ID: 3689215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. From another place and time. Little MA; Pitre S Radiol Technol; 1995; 67(1):78. PubMed ID: 7491411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Lay screeners in mammographic survey programs. Dowdy AH; Lagasse LD; Roach P; Wilson D Radiology; 1970 Jun; 95(3):619-21. PubMed ID: 5442669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Radiophotographic examination of the breast]. Tautz M; Lotz K Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1970; 11(5):617-9. PubMed ID: 5511030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [The acquistion of recent techniques for the radiological exploration of the breast (author's transl)]. Gordenne W; Garsou JL J Belge Radiol; 1977; 60(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 881408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Data on the radiation exposure of the breast in mammography. Studies on a group of 1593 female patients]. Giera W; Paterok EM; Prestele H; Säbel M; Weishaar J Rontgenpraxis; 1982 Dec; 35(12):445-53. PubMed ID: 7157088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [Quality, dosage and hazard rates in mammography]. Penn W Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1977; 18():101-3. PubMed ID: 601808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]