BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8538443)

  • 1. Item-specific interference caused by cue-dependent forgetting.
    Chandler CC; Gargano GJ
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Nov; 23(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 8538443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Butler KM; Williams CC; Zacks RT; Maki RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 11550757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?
    Goh WD; Tan H
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1063-79. PubMed ID: 17128605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrieval processes that produce interference in modified forced-choice recognition tests.
    Chandler CC; Gargano GJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 9584431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs.
    Gullick MM; Juhasz BJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 18609409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.
    Lozito JP; Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limits of the retrieval-inhibition construct: list segregation in directed forgetting.
    Wilson SP; Kipp K; Chapman K
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Oct; 130(4):359-79. PubMed ID: 14672100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of item strength in retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Jakab E; Raaijmakers JG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):607-17. PubMed ID: 19379039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Directed forgetting of related words: evidence for the inefficient inhibition hypothesis.
    Lehman EB; Srokowski SA; Hall LC; Renkey ME; Cruz CA
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Oct; 130(4):380-98. PubMed ID: 14672101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 16478341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):863-75. PubMed ID: 17723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are independent probes truly independent?
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.
    Lee YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 17475195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing an associative account of semantic satiation.
    Tian X; Huber DE
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Jun; 60(4):267-90. PubMed ID: 20156620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
    McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential effects in lexical decision: tests of compound-cue retrieval theory.
    Ratcliff R; McKoon G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1380-8. PubMed ID: 8744970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.