These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8538446)

  • 1. Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text.
    Budd D; Whitney P; Turley KJ
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Nov; 23(6):735-48. PubMed ID: 8538446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effects of macroprocessing skill on children's comprehension of expository text].
    Ishiwatari Y; Muramoto T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2011 Oct; 82(4):354-61. PubMed ID: 22117299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.
    Engle RW; Cantor J; Carullo JJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):972-92. PubMed ID: 1402719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: a difficult case for activation theories.
    Gunter TC; Wagner S; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):643-57. PubMed ID: 12965038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring of comprehension: the role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text.
    Weaver CA; Bryant DS
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 7885261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts.
    Wolfe MB; Woodwyk JM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):341-62. PubMed ID: 20128958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in children's working memory and writing skill.
    Swanson HL; Berninger VW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Nov; 63(2):358-85. PubMed ID: 8923751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: an individual-differences approach.
    Cantor J; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Sep; 19(5):1101-14. PubMed ID: 8409850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension.
    Waters GS; Caplan D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):51-75. PubMed ID: 8920099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
    Kane MJ; Bleckley MK; Conway AR; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 11409097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in children's comprehension of temporal relations: Dissociable contributions of working memory capacity and working memory updating.
    Karlsson J; Jolles D; Koornneef A; van den Broek P; Van Leijenhorst L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Sep; 185():1-18. PubMed ID: 31077975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resolution of activated background information in text comprehension.
    Wang R; Mo L; He X; Smythe I; Wang S
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 45(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 22044009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertical perceptual span and the processing of visual signals in reading.
    Cauchard F; Eyrolle H; Cellier JM; Hyönä J
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 45(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22043847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in working memory: introduction to the special section.
    Miyake A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 11409096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of working memory in inferential sentence comprehension.
    Pérez AI; Paolieri D; Macizo P; Bajo T
    Cogn Process; 2014 Aug; 15(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 24668068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports.
    Hyönä J; Nurminen AM
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):31-50. PubMed ID: 16464286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of advance questions on reading comprehension.
    Kreiner DS
    J Gen Psychol; 1996 Oct; 123(4):352-64. PubMed ID: 9042744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contextual knowledge reduces demands on working memory during reading.
    Miller LM; Cohen JA; Wingfield A
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1355-67. PubMed ID: 17225514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.
    Long DL; Prat CS
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):375-91. PubMed ID: 18426067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity.
    Sanchez CA; Wiley J
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):344-55. PubMed ID: 16752598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.