These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8538447)

  • 41. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Homophone effects in lexical decision.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):139-56. PubMed ID: 11204094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Syntactic context effects on word recognition: a developmental study.
    Hyönä J; Lindeman J
    Scand J Psychol; 1994 Mar; 35(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 8191259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Beginning reading with phonology.
    Masterson J; Laxon V; Stuart M
    Br J Psychol; 1992 Feb; 83 ( Pt 1)():1-12. PubMed ID: 1559140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Lexical factors in the word-superiority effect.
    Hildebrandt N; Caplan D; Sokol S; Torreano L
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 7885263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. When meaning is useless.
    Benetello A; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
    Memory; 2015; 23(7):1001-12. PubMed ID: 25121998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Electrophysiological evidence of sublexical phonological access in character processing by L2 Chinese learners of L1 alphabetic scripts.
    Yum YN; Law SP; Mo KN; Lau D; Su IF; Shum MS
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):339-52. PubMed ID: 26620688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Semantic facilitation of lexical access during sentence processing.
    Duffy SA; Henderson JM; Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):791-801. PubMed ID: 2528603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read.
    Grainger J; Lété B; Bertand D; Dufau S; Ziegler JC
    Cognition; 2012 May; 123(2):280-92. PubMed ID: 22357323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Lexical access in American Sign Language: an ERP investigation of effects of semantics and phonology.
    Gutierrez E; Williams D; Grosvald M; Corina D
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1468():63-83. PubMed ID: 22763237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention.
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Stolz JA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 18315417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Phonemic feature involvement in lexical access in grades 3 and 5: Evidence from visual and auditory lexical decision tasks.
    Sauval K; Perre L; Casalis S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():212-219. PubMed ID: 29258652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Investigating the roles of phonological and semantic memory in sentence recall.
    Alloway TP
    Memory; 2007 Aug; 15(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 17654276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers.
    Vellutino FR; Scanlon DM; Spearing D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Feb; 59(1):76-123. PubMed ID: 7876770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sentence repetition: what does the task measure?
    Polišenská K; Chiat S; Roy P
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2015; 50(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 25208477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009).
    Farmer TA; Monaghan P; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1318-25. PubMed ID: 21895396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. At-lexical, articulatory interference in silent reading: the "upstream" tongue-twister effect.
    Robinson DH; Katayama AD
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):661-5. PubMed ID: 9337584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task.
    Luo CR; Johnson RA; Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):833-43. PubMed ID: 9701974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):951-61. PubMed ID: 12219801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.