These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8538729)

  • 21. The Rise of Research Integrity: Everyone Will Play a Role.
    Civitelli R; Duffy K
    J Bone Miner Res; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1914-1915. PubMed ID: 30357931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ORI's unhappy lot.
    McCutchen CW
    Nature; 1995 Sep; 377(6547):282. PubMed ID: 7566078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. UCSF case raises questions about grant idea ownership.
    Barinaga M
    Science; 1997 Sep; 277(5331):1430-1. PubMed ID: 9304209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What is truth? Standards of scientific integrity in American Heart Association journals.
    Miano JM
    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2010 Jan; 30(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20018938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Authorship disputes.
    McCutchen CW
    Science; 1995 Dec; 270(5242):1557. PubMed ID: 7502057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scientific misconduct. EMF researcher made up data, ORI says.
    Vergano D
    Science; 1999 Jul; 285(5424):23, 925. PubMed ID: 10428693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recent conference addresses research integrity on global scale.
    Travis K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jan; 100(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 18159074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Didn't adhere to the rules.
    Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 May; 35(3):114. PubMed ID: 19421014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Popovic defended by technician.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1992 Jun; 256(5064):1623. PubMed ID: 1319086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.
    Dahlberg JE; Davidian NM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):713-35. PubMed ID: 20526693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Misconduct and misunderstanding.
    Siwek J
    Fam Med; 1990; 22(4):254. PubMed ID: 2384194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: evidence from ORI case files.
    Davis MS; Riske-Morris M; Diaz SR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2007 Dec; 13(4):395-414. PubMed ID: 18038194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ORI should stay.
    Ruedas LA
    Nature; 1994 Jun; 369(6483):701. PubMed ID: 8008056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ghostwriting: research misconduct, plagiarism, or fool's gold?
    Bosch X; Ross JS
    Am J Med; 2012 Apr; 125(4):324-6. PubMed ID: 22305580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Plagiarism: words and ideas.
    Bouville M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2008 Sep; 14(3):311-22. PubMed ID: 18368537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Research misconduct and the INTERGROWTH-21st study.
    Horton R; Kleinert S; Linklater S; Mullan Z
    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2017 Mar; 5(3):160-161. PubMed ID: 28196628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. More on Shockley.
    Hirsch J
    Nature; 1990 Feb; 343(6259):587. PubMed ID: 2304526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Congress communications, smartphones, and digital tablets: sharing or intellectual piracy?].
    Claudet I
    Arch Pediatr; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1276-7. PubMed ID: 24183874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Plagiarism.
    Goodman SR; Mallet RT
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2012 Jul; 237(7):739. PubMed ID: 22875775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Devi case and more.
    McCutchen CW
    Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5227):1032-3. PubMed ID: 7652542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.