These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8538915)

  • 1. Banff classification for the histological diagnosis of renal graft rejection: what are the advantages?
    Bogman MJ; Dooper IM
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1995; 10(8):1291-3. PubMed ID: 8538915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Banff classification of renal allograft pathology: where do we go from here?
    Racusen L; Rayner D; Trpkov K; Olsen S; Solez K
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Feb; 28(1):486-8. PubMed ID: 8644322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Current topics of the rejection pathology in human renal allografts].
    Morozumi K; Fukuda M; Takeda A
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1998 May; 44(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 9656109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Dynamic and flexible classification of transplant rejection].
    Mihatsch MJ; Nickeleit V
    Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2002; 86():19-27. PubMed ID: 12647348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical validity of Banff grading of chronic rejection in renal transplantation.
    Oh CK; Jeong HJ; Kim YS; Kim MS; Choi KH; Lee HY; Han DS; Park K
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Jun; 28(3):1441-2. PubMed ID: 8658731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Banff schema four years later.
    Solez K; Racusen L; Rayner D; Olsen S; Halloran P
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Feb; 28(1):450-2. PubMed ID: 8644311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement of lesion quantitation for the Banff schema for renal allograft rejection.
    Racusen LC
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Feb; 28(1):489-90. PubMed ID: 8644323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Banff classification of renal allograft pathology: where do we go from here?
    Racusen LC; Rayner DC; Trpkov K; Olsen S; Solez K
    Transplant Proc; 1995 Oct; 27(5):2561-3. PubMed ID: 7482825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft biopsies and clinical outcome.
    Tanaka T; Kyo M; Kokado Y; Takahara S; Hatori M; Suzuki K; Hasumi M; Toki K; Ichimaru N; Yazawa K; Hanafusa T; Namba Y; Oka K; Moriyama T; Imai E; Okuyama A; Yamanaka H
    Transpl Int; 2004 Feb; 17(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 14551678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical correlation of acute rejection according to Banff classification in renal transplantation.
    Lorriaux C; Pouteil Noble C; Dijoud F; Cahen R; Touraine JL; MacGregor B
    Transplant Proc; 2000 Mar; 32(2):443-4. PubMed ID: 10715473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Kidney transplantation: what does biopsy contribute?].
    Hailemariam S
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 130(25):952-6. PubMed ID: 10909722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liver allograft rejection: current status of classification and grading.
    Batts K
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Feb; 28(1):453-6. PubMed ID: 8644312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of the Banff classification in subclinical kidney transplant rejection.
    Veronese FV; Manfro RC; Roman FR; Edelweiss MI; Rush DN; Dancea S; Goldberg J; Gonçalves LF
    Clin Transplant; 2005 Aug; 19(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 16008598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SDF-1 expression is elevated in chronic human renal allograft rejection.
    Hoffmann U; Banas B; Krüger B; Banas M; Bergler T; Böger C; Kammerl M; Obed A; Rümmele P; Segerer S; Riegger GA; Krämer BK
    Clin Transplant; 2006; 20(6):712-8. PubMed ID: 17100720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can a diagnosis of renal allograft rejection be based on histology alone?
    Midtvedt K; Hartmann A; Sund S
    Clin Transplant; 1998 Aug; 12(4):300-2. PubMed ID: 9686323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical validation of the Banff 97 classification for the diagnosis of rejection in kidney transplant.
    Palomar R; Ruiz JC; Zubimendi JA; Pérez-Expósito MA; Val Bernal F; Arias M
    Transplant Proc; 2001; 33(7-8):3309. PubMed ID: 11750416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Clinicopathologic correlations in acute renal graft rejection].
    Pizzolitto S; Boscutti G; Falconieri G; Montanaro D
    G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 26():S19-27. PubMed ID: 15732040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should patients with "borderline" lesions of Banff criteria be treated by renal transplantation?
    Lorriaux C; Mac Gregor B; Dijoud F; Cahen R; Touraine JL; Pouteil-Nobel C
    Transplant Proc; 1998 Sep; 30(6):2823-4. PubMed ID: 9745582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A UK-wide trial of the Banff classification of renal transplant pathology in routine diagnostic practice.
    Furness PN; Kirkpatrick U; Taub N; Davies DR; Solez K
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1997 May; 12(5):995-100. PubMed ID: 9175057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Renal allograft pathology: the Banff classification.
    Baltzan M; George D
    Kidney Int; 1999 Oct; 56(4):1602-3. PubMed ID: 10610415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.