212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8539026)
1. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.
Rosenfield M; Chiu NN
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
Goss DA; Grosvenor T
J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Bailey MD; Twa MD; Mitchell GL; Dhaliwal DK; Jones LA; McMahon TT
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 15975474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection].
Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S; Sokolová SJ; Forýtková L; Holoubková Z
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components.
Zadnik K; Mutti DO; Adams AJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Jun; 33(7):2325-33. PubMed ID: 1607244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeatability of clinical measurements of the amplitude of accommodation.
Rosenfield M; Cohen AS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 May; 16(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 8977892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
du Toit R; Soong K; Brian G; Ramke J
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults.
Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B; Tsujimura S
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 11261343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new subjective refraction method--the meridional polarized vernier optometer.
Salmon TO; Horner DG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):599-605. PubMed ID: 8942132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
Salmon TO; van de Pol C
Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PowerRefractor versus Canon R-50 Autorefraction to assess refractive error in children: a community-based study in ecuador.
Virgili G; Angi M; Heede S; Rodriguez D; Bottega E; Molinari A
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Feb; 84(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17299345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability (test-retest variability) of refractive error measurement in clinical settings.
Leinonen J; Laakkonen E; Laatikainen L
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Aug; 84(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 16879577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Sakla HF
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 17720072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.
Sheppard AL; Davies LN
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
