These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8539090)

  • 1. Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: role of stimulus difference.
    Ben-Artzi E; Marks LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1151-62. PubMed ID: 8539090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lower pitch is larger, yet falling pitches shrink.
    Eitan Z; Schupak A; Gotler A; Marks LE
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(4):273-84. PubMed ID: 24351984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing linguistic and perceptual dimensions of speech: interactions in speeded classification.
    Ben-Artzi E; Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Jun; 25(3):579-95. PubMed ID: 10385980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size.
    Gallace A; Spence C
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1191-203. PubMed ID: 17355042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Processes underlying dimensional interactions: correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions.
    Melara RD; Marks LE
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Sep; 18(5):477-95. PubMed ID: 2233261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Del Gatto C; Spence C; Santangelo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):527-534. PubMed ID: 29116614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: tests of the semantic coding hypothesis.
    Martino G; Marks LE
    Perception; 1999; 28(7):903-23. PubMed ID: 10664781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions Between Auditory Elevation, Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation During Multisensory Perception.
    Jamal Y; Lacey S; Nygaard L; Sathian K
    Multisens Res; 2017 Jan; 30(3-5):287-306. PubMed ID: 31287081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does crossmodal correspondence modulate the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search?
    Klapetek A; Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 22648604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The suppression of reflexive visual and auditory orienting when attention is otherwise engaged.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 17311484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Role of Selective Attention in Cross-modal Interactions between Auditory and Visual Features.
    Evans KK
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104119. PubMed ID: 31751823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Garner and congruence effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals.
    Patching GR; Quinlan PT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Aug; 28(4):755-75. PubMed ID: 12190249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch, and loudness.
    Melara RD; Marks LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 2385491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional interaction between color and pitch.
    Melara RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 2522534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Timbral brightness perception investigated through multimodal interference.
    Saitis C; Wallmark Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Aug; 86(6):1835-1845. PubMed ID: 39090510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conjoining auditory and visual features during high-rate serial presentation: processing and conjoining two features can be faster than processing one.
    Woods DL; Alain C; Ogawa KH
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 9529908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simon congruency effects based on stimulus and response numerosity.
    Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 16618641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 1826309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison is not just subtraction: effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference.
    Hellström A
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1161-77. PubMed ID: 14674641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stroop can occur without Garner interference: strategic and mandatory influences in multidimensional stimuli.
    Van Leeuwen C; Bakker L
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Apr; 57(3):379-92. PubMed ID: 7770328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.