BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8539461)

  • 1. Limitations of a pencil beam approach to photon dose calculations in the head and neck region.
    Hurkmans C; Knöös T; Nilsson P; Svahn-Tapper G; Danielsson H
    Radiother Oncol; 1995 Oct; 37(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 8539461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Underdosage of the upper-airway mucosa for small fields as used in intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparison between radiochromic film measurements, Monte Carlo simulations, and collapsed cone convolution calculations.
    Martens C; Reynaert N; De Wagter C; Nilsson P; Coghe M; Palmans H; Thierens H; De Neve W
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1528-35. PubMed ID: 12148735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
    Krieger T; Sauer OA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photon scatter in portal images: accuracy of a fluence based pencil beam superposition algorithm.
    McCurdy BM; Pistorius S
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 10841394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are neutrons responsible for the dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the build-up region for a high-energy photon beam?
    Ding GX; Duzenli C; Kalach NI
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3251-61. PubMed ID: 12361221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
    Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wedge factor constituents of high-energy photon beams: head and phantom scatter dose components.
    Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Jul; 32(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7938681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling scatter-to-primary dose ratio for megavoltage photon beams.
    Wang KK; Zhu TC
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5270-8. PubMed ID: 21089761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo dose calculations for radiotherapy machines: Theratron 780-C teletherapy case study.
    Sichani BT; Sohrabpour M
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):807-18. PubMed ID: 15070204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose to superficial node for patients with head and neck cancer treated with 6 MV and 60Co photons.
    Chu JC; Coia LR; Aziz D; Stafford PM
    Radiother Oncol; 1991 Aug; 21(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 1924863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for a high-energy photon beam.
    Ding GX
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2459-63. PubMed ID: 12462709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Head scatter off-axis for megavoltage x rays.
    Zhu TC; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 12722805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peak scatter factors for high energy photon beams.
    Li XA
    Med Phys; 1999 Jun; 26(6):962-6. PubMed ID: 10436898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Monte Carlo study on internal wedges using BEAM.
    van der Zee W; Welleweerd J
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 12033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-density dental implants and radiotherapy planning: evaluation of effects on dose distribution using pencil beam convolution algorithm and Monte Carlo method.
    Çatli S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):46–52. PubMed ID: 26699323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a need for a revised table of equivalent square fields for the determination of phantom scatter correction factors?
    Venselaar JL; Heukelom S; Jager HN; Mijnheer BJ; van Gasteren JJ; van Kleffens HJ; van der Laarse R; Westermann CF
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2369-81. PubMed ID: 9434294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Zero-field" dose data for 60Co and other high-energy photon beams in water.
    Nizin P; Qian GX; Rashid H
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1353-60. PubMed ID: 8289716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo study of TLD measurements in air cavities.
    Haraldsson P; Knöös T; Nyström H; Engström P
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):N253-9. PubMed ID: 14529213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.