These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8541604)

  • 1. [Sex difference of the facial profile: segments and angles, bony and cutaneous. A study using the discriminant function].
    Baillet R; Fenart R
    Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy); 1995 Sep; 79(246):13-6. PubMed ID: 8541604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Sex differences of segments and angles of the facial profile, as studied by discriminant analysis].
    Terk B; Fenart R
    Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():613-7. PubMed ID: 1341754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The segments of facial profiles: cutaneous and osseous. Sex differences using canonical correlations].
    Nazat D; Fenart R
    Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy); 1992 Jun; 76(233):53-5. PubMed ID: 1467566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Determination of the cutaneous sagittal profile of the face from knowledge of the bony profile in the European young adult].
    Deloison Y; Fenart R
    Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy); 1996 Mar; 80(248):9-12. PubMed ID: 9004871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative study of several processes of multivariate statistics in the morphologic analysis of the facial profile. Specificity and limits].
    Fenart R; Nazat D; Baillet R
    Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy); 1994 Jun; 78(241):19-21. PubMed ID: 8086660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The canonical correlation of the cutaneous-skeletal relation of the facial profile, in each of the 2 sexes].
    Salmon JP; Fenart R
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():1077-82. PubMed ID: 1842246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The use of regression functions for reconstruction of the cutaneous profile, from facial bone elements].
    Deloison Y; Fenart R
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1997 Nov; 98 Suppl 1():85-8. PubMed ID: 9471707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Symmetry of the human midface].
    Koch A; Wiese KG; Rasse M
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 1993 Dec; 79(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 8128759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Looking at the adult face].
    Behrents RG
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9432622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Facial measurements and proportions in children: contributions to orofacial myofunctional evaluation].
    Cattoni DM; Fernandes FD
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 15109103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender-confirming facial surgery: considerations on the masculinity and femininity of faces.
    Hage JJ; Becking AG; de Graaf FH; Tuinzing DB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jun; 99(7):1799-807. PubMed ID: 9180702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Determination of skeletal sex using discriminant analysis of ulnar measurements].
    Introna F; Dragone M; Frassanito P; Colonna M
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1993 Sep; 69(9):517-23. PubMed ID: 8155309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Craniofacial growth: a three-dimensional soft-tissue study from 6 years to adulthood.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1998; 18(3):138-49. PubMed ID: 9785218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visualizing facial shape regression upon 2nd to 4th digit ratio and testosterone.
    Schaefer K; Fink B; Mitteroecker P; Neave N; Bookstein FL
    Coll Antropol; 2005 Dec; 29(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 16417137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.
    Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphometric correlation between facial soft-tissue profile shape and skeletal pattern in children and adolescents.
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 17920497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 2D:4D and sexually dimorphic facial characteristics.
    Burriss RP; Little AC; Nelson EC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Jun; 36(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 17203400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facial soft tissue thickness in northwest Indian adults.
    Sahni D; Sanjeev ; Singh G; Jit I; Singh P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Apr; 176(2-3):137-46. PubMed ID: 17997243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The potential role of stereolithography in the study of facial aging.
    Pessa JE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Feb; 119(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11174556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.