These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8541973)

  • 41. Aerodynamic measures of speech in unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) patients.
    Pinho CM; Jesus LM; Barney A
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Apr; 38(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 22741532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Use of spectral/cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from hypofunctional voices in sustained vowel and continuous speech contexts.
    Watts CR; Awan SN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1525-37. PubMed ID: 22180020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of consonant voicing characteristics on sentence production in abductor versus adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Cannito MP; Chorna LB; Kahane JC; Dworkin JP
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):394.e13-22. PubMed ID: 24440058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Optimal selection of wavelet-packet-based features using genetic algorithm in pathological assessment of patients' speech signal with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
    Behroozmand R; Almasganj F
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Apr; 37(4):474-85. PubMed ID: 17034780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types.
    Wolfe V; Fitch J; Martin D
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(6):292-9. PubMed ID: 9415734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders.
    Maryn Y; De Bodt M; Roy N
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(3):161-74. PubMed ID: 20080243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Acoustic recognition of voice disorders: a comparative study of running speech versus sustained vowels.
    Klingholtz F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2218-24. PubMed ID: 2348025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
    Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Acoustic Analyses of Prolonged Vowels in Young Adults With Friedreich Ataxia.
    Carson C; Ryalls J; Hardin-Hollingsworth K; Le Normand MT; Ruddy B
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26454768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation.
    Solomon NP; Awan SN; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 23177742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech.
    Chen SH; Liu H; Xu Y; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1157-63. PubMed ID: 17348536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The validity of real-time spectrum analysis of Finnish vowel formants in profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Suonpää J; Aaltonen O
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 7178802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Tracking voice change after thyroidectomy: application of spectral/cepstral analyses.
    Awan SN; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A; Solomon NP
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Apr; 25(4):302-20. PubMed ID: 21158501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
    Watts CR; Awan SN; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Prediction of vocal severity within and across voice types.
    Wolfe VI; Steinfatt TM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Jun; 30(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 3599955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: a four-factor acoustic model.
    Awan SN; Roy N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 16393797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types.
    Wolfe V; Cornell R; Palmer C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 2072674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Hoarseness].
    Klingholz F
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Jul; 67(7):346-9. PubMed ID: 3210866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.