These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8543128)

  • 1. [Quality assurance by improved cooperation structures. The example of decentralized early detection mammography].
    Swart E; Robra BP; Dierks ML; Frischbier HJ; Hoeffken W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Oct; 55(10):559-65. PubMed ID: 8543128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [German Mammography Study: commission, cooperative structure, results and consequences].
    Robra BP; Swart E; Dierks ML
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1997 Sep; 91(6):541-2. PubMed ID: 9441030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The changing pattern of early breast cancer and its primary management at CAMC.
    Jubelirer SJ; Smith JI; Gharib M
    W V Med J; 1993 Oct; 89(10):442-4. PubMed ID: 8266681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
    Temple LK; Wang EE; McLeod RS
    CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):1001-8. PubMed ID: 10551200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Guideline for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Germany 2008. Recommendations from the short version].
    Albert US; Altland H; Duda V; Engel J; Geraedts M; Heywang-Köbrunner S; Hölzel D; Kalbheim E; Koller M; König K; Kreienberg R; Kühn T; Lebeau A; Nass-Griegoleit I; Schlake W; Schmutzler R; Schreer I; Schulte H; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wagner U; Kopp I
    Chirurg; 2008 Jun; 79(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 18463837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004.
    Bhosle M; Samuel S; Vosuri V; Paskett E; Balkrishnan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 103(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17028978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Program to increase the accessibility of screening mammography--Rhode Island, 1987-1988.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1991 Jun; 40(23):390-3. PubMed ID: 2041540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility of universal screening mammography. Lessons from a community intervention.
    Costanza ME; D'Orsi CJ; Greene HL; Gaw VP; Karellas A; Zapka JG
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Sep; 151(9):1851-6. PubMed ID: 1888252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.
    Becker N; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 17415093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer screening--the European experience.
    Perry NM
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15633481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency and determinants of screening for breast cancer in primary care group practice.
    Love RR; Brown RL; Davis JE; Baumann LJ; Fontana SA; Sanner LA
    Arch Intern Med; 1993 Sep; 153(18):2113-7. PubMed ID: 8379802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Process indicators from ten centres in the Finnish breast cancer screening programme from 1991 to 2000.
    Sarkeala T; Anttila A; Forsman H; Luostarinen T; Saarenmaa I; Hakama M
    Eur J Cancer; 2004 Sep; 40(14):2116-25. PubMed ID: 15341987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography in the Tampa Bay area: current status and implications for the next decade.
    Clark RA; King PS; Cox CE; Bromley J; Mauer K
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 May; 76(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 2614349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Search for effective means in the early detection of breast cancer].
    Pavlov KA; Semiglazov VF; Chernomordikova MF
    Vopr Onkol; 1981; 27(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 7281589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Concept and implementation of model projects for mammography screening in Germany].
    Junkermann H; Becker N; Peitgen HO
    Radiologe; 2001 Apr; 41(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 11388053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of mammography in screening for breast cancer.
    Sierra AE; Potchen EJ
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1990 Dec; 17(4):927-38. PubMed ID: 2092250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
    Suarez L; Pulley L
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period].
    Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Weigel S; Nüssle-Kügele K; Sittek H; Arand B; Morakkabati N; Leutner C; Tombach B; Nordhoff D; Perlet C; Rieber A; Heindel W; Brambs HJ; Schild H
    Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 15902631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.