166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8544004)
1. Nuclear arthrography: combined scintigraphic and radiographic procedure for diagnosis of total hip prosthesis loosening.
Oyen WJ; Lemmens JA; Claessens RA; van Horn JR; Slooff TJ; Corstens FH
J Nucl Med; 1996 Jan; 37(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 8544004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of radiographic and scintigraphic techniques to assess aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in a total hip replacement.
Temmerman OP; Raijmakers PG; David EF; Pijpers R; Molenaar MA; Hoekstra OS; Berkhof J; Manoliu RA; Teule GJ; Heyligers IC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 15523018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in the assessment of aseptic femoral component loosening.
Temmerman OP; Raijmakers PG; Berkhof J; David EF; Pijpers R; Molenaar MA; Hoekstra OS; Teule GJ; Heyligers IC
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jul; 126(5):316-23. PubMed ID: 16547724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast and nuclear arthrography in loosening of the uncemented hip prosthesis.
Swan JS; Braunstein EM; Wellman HN; Capello W
Skeletal Radiol; 1991; 20(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2000499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnosis of loosening in total hip prostheses. Clinical, radiographic and scintigraphic investigation.
Lorenzi GL; Rossi P; Denicolai F; Dettoni A; Quaglia F
Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1987 Jun; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 3482832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of contrast and subtraction arthrography in the assessment of aseptic loosening of total hip prostheses: a meta-analysis.
Temmerman OP; Heyligers IC; Teule GJ; Hoekstra OS; Raijmakers PG
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Oct; 56(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 15893898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of a loose acetabular component of a total hip prosthesis: a systematic review.
Temmerman OP; Raijmakers PG; Deville WL; Berkhof J; Hooft L; Heyligers IC
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Sep; 22(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 17826271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of indium-111 DTPA radionuclide and iothalamate meglumine roentgenographic arthrography in the evaluation of painful total hip arthroplasty.
Maxon HR; Schneider HJ; Hopson CN; Miller EH; Von Stein DE; Kereiakes JG; Cummings DD; McDevitt RM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Aug; (245):156-9. PubMed ID: 2752616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide arthrography in revision total hip arthroplasty.
von Knoch M; Barden B; Saxler G; Löer F
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Dec; 49(12):351-5. PubMed ID: 15655928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of aspiration and contrast-enhanced arthrography in evaluating the uncemented hip arthroplasty.
Cheung A; Lachiewicz PF; Renner JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1305-9. PubMed ID: 9129431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arthroscintigraphic evaluation of the painful total hip prosthesis.
Resnik CS; Fratkin MJ; Cardea JA
Clin Nucl Med; 1986 Apr; 11(4):242-4. PubMed ID: 3956037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Loosening of the cemented hip prosthesis. The importance of heat injury.
Mjöberg B
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1986; 221():1-40. PubMed ID: 3468743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cemented total hip prosthesis: radiographic and scintigraphic evaluation.
Aliabadi P; Tumeh SS; Weissman BN; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):203-6. PubMed ID: 2675184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Alloarthroplasty of the hip joint. Radiologic diagnosis of loosening and infection in cemented total endoprostheses].
Dihlmann W; Dihlmann SW; Hering L
Radiologe; 1991 Oct; 31(10):496-505. PubMed ID: 1956981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of radiographic and radionuclide hip arthrography in determination of femoral component loosening of hip arthroplasties.
Capello WN; Uri BG; Wellman HN; Robb JA; Stiver PL
Hip; 1985; ():157-68. PubMed ID: 3830981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of the plain roentgen image and arthrography in diagnosis of loosening of cemented hip endoprostheses].
Greiner B; Braun M; Becker W
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 9381764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of metallic osseous implants with nuclear medicine.
Wellman HN; Schauwecker DS; Capello WN
Semin Nucl Med; 1988 Apr; 18(2):126-36. PubMed ID: 3291126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital subtraction arthrography in preoperative evaluation of painful total hip arthroplasty.
Ginai AZ; van Biezen FC; Kint PA; Oei HY; Hop WC
Skeletal Radiol; 1996 May; 25(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 8738001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arthrography of painful hips following arthroplasty: digital versus plain film subtraction.
Walker CW; FitzRandolph RL; Collins DN; Dalrymple GV
Skeletal Radiol; 1991; 20(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 1925670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of subtraction arthrography in total hip arthroplasties.
Barentsz JO; Lemmens JM; Slooff TJ
Rofo; 1986 Apr; 144(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 3008258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
