These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8544016)

  • 1. Quantitation of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction.
    Marshall KW; Mikulis DJ; Guthrie BM
    J Orthop Res; 1995 Nov; 13(6):814-23. PubMed ID: 8544016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
    Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume.
    Cicuttini F; Forbes A; Asbeutah A; Morris K; Stuckey S
    J Orthop Res; 2000 Jul; 18(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 11052494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
    Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cartilage volume quantification via Live Wire segmentation.
    Gougoutas AJ; Wheaton AJ; Borthakur A; Shapiro EM; Kneeland JB; Udupa JK; Reddy R
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1389-95. PubMed ID: 15596377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional T1rho-weighted MRI at 1.5 Tesla.
    Borthakur A; Wheaton A; Charagundla SR; Shapiro EM; Regatte RR; Akella SV; Kneeland JB; Reddy R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jun; 17(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 12766904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence.
    Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Eckstein F; Schnier M; Haubner M; Priebsch J; Glaser C; Englmeier KH; Reiser M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jul; (352):137-48. PubMed ID: 9678042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Dec; 9(6):360-76. PubMed ID: 9894739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [MRT of the knee joint cartilage using 3D volume imaging in combination with a fast image processor].
    Adam G; Bondorf K; Prescher A; Drobnitzky M; Günther RW
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 2587726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial.
    Eckstein F; Buck RJ; Burstein D; Charles HC; Crim J; Hudelmaier M; Hunter DJ; Hutchins G; Jackson C; Kraus VB; Lane NE; Link TM; Majumdar LS; Mazzuca S; Prasad PV; Schnitzer TJ; Taljanovic MS; Vaz A; Wyman B; Le Graverand MP;
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2008 Dec; 67(12):1683-8. PubMed ID: 18283054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.
    Yoshioka H; Alley M; Steines D; Stevens K; Rubesova E; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12815641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
    Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Three-dimensional thickness and volume measurements of the knee joint cartilage by MR tomography: reproducibility in volunteers].
    Westhoff J; Eckstein F; Sittek H; Lösch A; Faber S; Kolem H; Englmeier KH; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 9465953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D-T1rho-relaxation mapping of articular cartilage: in vivo assessment of early degenerative changes in symptomatic osteoarthritic subjects.
    Regatte RR; Akella SV; Wheaton AJ; Lech G; Borthakur A; Kneeland JB; Reddy R
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):741-9. PubMed ID: 15217591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of MRI vs. laboratory measurements in an ex vivo porcine model of arthritic cartilage loss.
    Jaremko JL; Maciejewski CM; Cheng RW; Ronsky JL; Thompson RB; Lambert RG; Dhillon SS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):992-1000. PubMed ID: 17896352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and precision in the detection of articular cartilage lesions using magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in an in vitro study with orthopedic and histopathologic correlation.
    Schaefer FK; Kurz B; Schaefer PJ; Fuerst M; Hedderich J; Graessner J; Schuenke M; Heller H
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Dec; 48(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18038353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeatability of patellar cartilage thickness patterns in the living, using a fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequence with short acquisition time and three-dimensional data processing.
    Tieschky M; Faber S; Haubner M; Kolem H; Schulte E; Englmeier KH; Reiser M; Eckstein F
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Nov; 15(6):808-13. PubMed ID: 9497804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.
    Marlovits S; Striessnig G; Resinger CT; Aldrian SM; Vecsei V; Imhof H; Trattnig S
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 52(3):310-9. PubMed ID: 15544911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.