These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8545871)
1. Absorption characteristics of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in de novo pediatric liver transplant recipients. Dunn SP; Cooney GF; Kulinsky A; Falkenstein K; Pierson A; Elder CA; Meligeni J Transplantation; 1995 Dec; 60(12):1438-42. PubMed ID: 8545871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. NOF-11: a one-year pediatric randomized double-blind comparison of neoral versus sandimmune in orthotopic liver transplantation. Alvarez F; Atkison PR; Grant DR; Guilbault N; Jones AB; Kim PS; Kneteman NM; Laurin L; Martin SR; Murphy GF; Paradis K; Shapiro J; Smith LJ; Superina RA Transplantation; 2000 Jan; 69(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 10653385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of cyclosporine microemulsion in heart transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind comparison with the oil based formulation of cyclosporine--results at six months after transplantation. Eisen HJ; Hobbs RE; Davis SF; Laufer G; Mancini DM; Renlund DG; Valantine H; Ventura H; Vachiery JL; Bourge RC; Canver CC; Carrier M; Costanzo MR; Copeland J; Dureau G; Frazier OH; Dorent R; Hauptman PJ; Kells C; Master R; Michaud JL; Paradis I; Smith A; Vanhaecke J; Mueller EA Transplantation; 1999 Sep; 68(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 10507486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pharmacokinetics of an oral solution of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in maintenance pediatric liver transplant recipients. Dunn S; Cooney G; Sommerauer J; Lindsay C; McDiarmid S; Wong RL; Chang CT; Smith HT; Choc MG Transplantation; 1997 Jun; 63(12):1762-7. PubMed ID: 9210501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation]. Roy A; Grant DR; Kneteman NM; Tchervenkov JI; Levy GA; Tan A; Hendricks L Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to convert from traditional cyclosporine to the microemulsion formulation in stable renal transplant patients? Gaspari F; Perico N; Pisoni R; Anedda MF; Signorini O; Caruso R; Gotti E; Remuzzi G Clin Transplant; 1998 Oct; 12(5):379-90. PubMed ID: 9787945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absorption profiling of cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) during the first 2 weeks after renal transplantation. Canadian Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group Transplantation; 2001 Sep; 72(6):1024-32. PubMed ID: 11579295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of cyclosporine microemulsion in heart transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind comparison with the oil-based formulation of cyclosporine--results at 24 months after transplantation. Eisen HJ; Hobbs RE; Davis SF; Carrier M; Mancini DM; Smith A; Valantine H; Ventura H; Mehra M; Vachiery JL; Rayburn BK; Canver CC; Laufer G; Costanzo MR; Copeland J; Dureau G; Frazier OH; Dorent R; Hauptman PJ; Kells C; Masters R; Michaud JL; Paradis I; Renlund DG; Vanhaecke J; Mellein B; Mueller EA Transplantation; 2001 Jan; 71(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 11211198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of microemulsion and conventional formulations of cyclosporine A in preventing acute rejection in de novo kidney transplant patients. The U.K. Neoral Renal Study Group. Pollard SG; Lear PA; Ready AR; Moore RH; Johnson RW Transplantation; 1999 Nov; 68(9):1325-31. PubMed ID: 10573071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cyclosporine microemulsion increases drug exposure and reduces acute rejection without incremental toxicity in de novo renal transplantation. International Sandimmun Neoral Study Group. Keown P; Niese D Kidney Int; 1998 Sep; 54(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 9734620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in pediatric long-term liver transplant recipients converted from Sandimmun to Neoral. Melter M; Rodeck B; Kardorff R; Hoyer PF; Brodehl J Transpl Int; 1997; 10(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 9428114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for earlier stabilization of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in de novo renal transplant patients receiving a microemulsion formulation. Kovarik JM; Mueller EA; Richard F; Niese D; Halloran PF; Jeffery J; Paul LC; Keown PA Transplantation; 1996 Sep; 62(6):759-63. PubMed ID: 8824473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized, double-blind, one-year study of the safety and tolerability of cyclosporine microemulsion compared with conventional cyclosporine in renal transplant patients. International Sandimmun Neoral Study Group. Frei UA; Neumayer HH; Buchholz B; Niese D; Mueller EA Transplantation; 1998 Jun; 65(11):1455-60. PubMed ID: 9645802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized trial of cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) versus conventional cyclosporine in liver transplantation: MILTON study. Multicentre International Study in Liver Transplantation of Neoral. Otto MG; Mayer AD; Clavien PA; Cavallari A; Gunawardena KA; Mueller EA Transplantation; 1998 Dec; 66(12):1632-40. PubMed ID: 9884251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of pharmacokinetics of Neoral and Sandimmune in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients. van Mourik ID; Thomson M; Kelly DA Liver Transpl Surg; 1999 Mar; 5(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 10071349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cyclosporin A (Neoral) in pediatric organ transplantation. Neoral Pediatric Study Group. Hoyer PF Pediatr Transplant; 1998 Feb; 2(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10084758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral). A pharmacoeconomic review of its use compared with standard cyclosporin in renal and hepatic transplantation. Coukell AJ; Plosker GL Pharmacoeconomics; 1998 Dec; 14(6):691-708. PubMed ID: 10346420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]