These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8546556)

  • 1. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
    Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.
    Elmore JG; Wells CK; Lee CH; Howard DH; Feinstein AR
    N Engl J Med; 1994 Dec; 331(22):1493-9. PubMed ID: 7969300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controversies in mammography.
    Timins JK
    N J Med; 2005; 102(1-2):45-9. PubMed ID: 15790065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of recommendations for breast biopsies in women receiving mammograms from a county health van.
    Kann PE; Bradley C; Lane DS
    Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 9475937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An exact test for detecting inconsistency in readers interpretation over time in screening mammograms.
    Lee JH; Eschrich S; Beam C
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 17638286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer screening in women aged 80 and older: results from a national survey.
    Schonberg MA; McCarthy EP; Davis RB; Phillips RS; Hamel MB
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 Oct; 52(10):1688-95. PubMed ID: 15450046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A test of performance of breast MRI interpretation in a multicentre screening study.
    Warren R; Hayes C; Pointon L; Hoff R; Gilbert FJ; Padhani AR; Rubin C; Kaplan G; Raza K; Wilkinson L; Hall-Craggs M; Kessar P; Rankin S; Dixon AK; Walsh J; Turnbull L; Britton P; Sinnatamby R; Easton D; Thompson D; Lakhani SR; Leach MO;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(7):917-29. PubMed ID: 16916709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mammography screening in Tromsö. Realization and results of the first mammography screening in Norway].
    Gram IT; Lund-Larsen PG; Rosenlund AF; Størmer J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 Apr; 109(10):1040-2. PubMed ID: 2727961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications.
    Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Toledano AY; Doi K
    Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):787-94. PubMed ID: 11526283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accreditation of mammography facilities by the American College of Radiology: results of a national survey.
    Brown ML; Fintor L
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.
    Kim SH; Lee EH; Jun JK; Kim YM; Chang YW; Lee JH; Kim HW; Choi EJ;
    Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30672161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.
    Beam CA; Conant EF; Sickles EA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Feb; 95(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 12591984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography screening: successes and problems in implementing widespread use in the United States.
    Gold RH; Bassett LW; Fox SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):1039-46. PubMed ID: 3628751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.
    Elmore JG; Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Buist DS
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 19864507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy].
    Vergnaghi D; Panizza P; Gozzi G
    Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 11213407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of the influence of clinical breast examination reports on the interpretation of mammograms in a breast screening program. Ontario Breast Screening Program Radiologists Research Group.
    Knight JA; Libstug AR; Moravan V; Boyd NF
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1998 Mar; 48(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 9541190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.