111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8547766)
1. A mathematical lifting model of the lumbar spine.
Stambough J; Genaidy A; Guo L
J Spinal Disord; 1995 Aug; 8(4):264-77. PubMed ID: 8547766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation.
Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
Ergonomics; 1997 Sep; 40(9):916-27. PubMed ID: 9306742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive manual handling limits for lowering, pushing, pulling and carrying activities.
Shoaf C; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Waters T; Christensen D
Ergonomics; 1997 Nov; 40(11):1183-200. PubMed ID: 9375533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
Davis JR; Mirka GA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of biomechanical parameters in the lumbar spine during static sagittal plane lifting.
Kong WZ; Goel VK; Gilbertson LG
J Biomech Eng; 1998 Apr; 120(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 10412390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of initial horizontal weight placement on the loads at the lumbar spine while lifting.
Schipplein OD; Reinsel TE; Andersson GB; Lavender SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(17):1895-8. PubMed ID: 8560338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
Chaffin DB; Page GB
Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spine loading as a function of gender.
Marras WS; Davis KG; Jorgensen M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2514-20. PubMed ID: 12435984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Loads in the spinal structures during lifting: development of a three-dimensional comprehensive biomechanical model.
Han JS; Goel VK; Ahn JY; Winterbottom J; McGowan D; Weinstein J; Cook T
Eur Spine J; 1995; 4(3):153-68. PubMed ID: 7552650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
Ciriello VM
Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
Granata KP; Marras WS
J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Severe obesity effect on low back biomechanical stress of manual load lifting.
Singh D; Park W; Hwang D; Levy MS
Work; 2015 Jun; 51(2):337-48. PubMed ID: 25248524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
Wu SP
Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regional changes in spine posture at lift onset with changes in lift distance and lift style.
Gill KP; Bennett SJ; Savelsbergh GJ; van Dieën JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1599-604. PubMed ID: 17621206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
Nicholson AS
Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physiological and psychophysical comparison between a lifting task with identical weight but different coupling factors.
Adams KJ; DeBeliso M; Sevene-Adams PG; Berning JM; Miller T; Tollerud DJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 20072069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is a demanding lifting job for manual handling workers in Hong Kong?
Yeung SS; Genaidy AM; Deddens J; Leung PC
Ergonomics; 2003 May; 46(6):574-97. PubMed ID: 12745689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
