These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8547766)

  • 1. A mathematical lifting model of the lumbar spine.
    Stambough J; Genaidy A; Guo L
    J Spinal Disord; 1995 Aug; 8(4):264-77. PubMed ID: 8547766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comprehensive lifting model: beyond the NIOSH lifting equation.
    Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
    Ergonomics; 1997 Sep; 40(9):916-27. PubMed ID: 9306742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehensive manual handling limits for lowering, pushing, pulling and carrying activities.
    Shoaf C; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Waters T; Christensen D
    Ergonomics; 1997 Nov; 40(11):1183-200. PubMed ID: 9375533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transverse-contour modeling of trunk muscle-distributed forces and spinal loads during lifting and twisting.
    Davis JR; Mirka GA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jan; 25(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 10685481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of biomechanical parameters in the lumbar spine during static sagittal plane lifting.
    Kong WZ; Goel VK; Gilbertson LG
    J Biomech Eng; 1998 Apr; 120(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 10412390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of initial horizontal weight placement on the loads at the lumbar spine while lifting.
    Schipplein OD; Reinsel TE; Andersson GB; Lavender SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(17):1895-8. PubMed ID: 8560338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
    Chaffin DB; Page GB
    Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spine loading as a function of gender.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Jorgensen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2514-20. PubMed ID: 12435984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loads in the spinal structures during lifting: development of a three-dimensional comprehensive biomechanical model.
    Han JS; Goel VK; Ahn JY; Winterbottom J; McGowan D; Weinstein J; Cook T
    Eur Spine J; 1995; 4(3):153-68. PubMed ID: 7552650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
    Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting.
    Granata KP; Marras WS
    J Biomech; 1995 Nov; 28(11):1309-17. PubMed ID: 8522544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Severe obesity effect on low back biomechanical stress of manual load lifting.
    Singh D; Park W; Hwang D; Levy MS
    Work; 2015 Jun; 51(2):337-48. PubMed ID: 25248524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regional changes in spine posture at lift onset with changes in lift distance and lift style.
    Gill KP; Bennett SJ; Savelsbergh GJ; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1599-604. PubMed ID: 17621206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physiological and psychophysical comparison between a lifting task with identical weight but different coupling factors.
    Adams KJ; DeBeliso M; Sevene-Adams PG; Berning JM; Miller T; Tollerud DJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 20072069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is a demanding lifting job for manual handling workers in Hong Kong?
    Yeung SS; Genaidy AM; Deddens J; Leung PC
    Ergonomics; 2003 May; 46(6):574-97. PubMed ID: 12745689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.