These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8548726)

  • 1. Re: Reviewers of manuscripts submitted to The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.
    Oyewumi LK
    Can J Psychiatry; 1995 Sep; 40(7):427-8. PubMed ID: 8548726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [How to review English-written manuscripts submitted to peer-review journals].
    Asano E
    No To Shinkei; 2005 Oct; 57(10):877-81. PubMed ID: 16277232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trainees in peer review: our experience.
    Castillo M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 23703147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why should I review journal manuscripts?
    Munk PL; Murphy KJ; Nicolaou S; Klass D
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2014 Aug; 65(3):193. PubMed ID: 25063742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review policies in medical student journals.
    Al-Busaidi IS; Alamri Y
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Jun; 94(1112):362-363. PubMed ID: 29463683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [How to make out misuse of statistics in manuscripts or papers quickly and accurately].
    Hu LP; Liu HG
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2007 Jan; 5(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 17214946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do reviewers affect the final outcome? Comparison of the quality of peer review and relative acceptance rates of submitted manuscripts.
    Kurihara Y; Colletti PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):468-70. PubMed ID: 23971437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal?
    Kljaković-Gaspić M; Hren D; Marusić A; Marusić M
    Arch Med Res; 2003; 34(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 14602513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound during 2012.
    Lamb CR; Mai W
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2015; 56(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 24798652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.
    Hall SA; Wilcox AJ
    Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics and journal publishing: taking the debate forward. Ethics of refereeing re-examined.
    Heok KE
    Addiction; 1995 Oct; 90(10):1311-2. PubMed ID: 8616452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blinded vs. unblinded peer review of manuscripts submitted to a dermatology journal: a randomized multi-rater study.
    Alam M; Kim NA; Havey J; Rademaker A; Ratner D; Tregre B; West DP; Coleman WP
    Br J Dermatol; 2011 Sep; 165(3):563-7. PubMed ID: 21623749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Steering Committee of Medical Editors.
    Br Med J; 1978 May; 1(6123):1334-6. PubMed ID: 647265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in the ethos of medical publications as reflected in progressive alterations in the uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (1979-2008).
    Kojima T; Barron JP
    Chest; 2010 Jun; 137(6):1479-82. PubMed ID: 20525661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.
    Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E
    Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.