207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8549465)
1. Risk assessment, a community perspective.
Feldman J
Environ Health Perspect; 1995 Sep; 103 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):153-8. PubMed ID: 8549465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. When enough data are not enough to enact policy: The failure to ban chlorpyrifos.
Trasande L
PLoS Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(12):e2003671. PubMed ID: 29267272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer prevention through a precautionary approach to environmental chemicals.
Kriebel D
Rev Environ Health; 2009; 24(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 20384033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The hormesis challenge for environmental health regulators.
Baram PM
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Aug; 20(8):435-8. PubMed ID: 11727796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hormesis and the law.
Heinzerling L; Lechleider RJ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Mar; 20(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 11326779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Inhalation health risk to golfers from turfgrass pesticides at three northeastern U.S. sites.
Murphy RR; Haith DA
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(3):1038-43. PubMed ID: 17328221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protecting children from pesticides and other toxic chemicals.
Landrigan PJ; Goldman LR
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2011; 21(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 21224896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Environment. Endosulfan's exit: U.S. EPA pesticide review leads to a ban.
Lubick N
Science; 2010 Jun; 328(5985):1466. PubMed ID: 20558680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Interactions between environmental health and pediatric obesity.
McClafferty H
Explore (NY); 2008; 4(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 18775404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tight deadlines and data gaps fan fight on pesticide safety.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 1998 Nov; 396(6708):207. PubMed ID: 9834026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation and application of delayed neurotoxicity test data from regulatory and legal viewpoints: panel discussion.
Rosenstein LS; Maddy KT; Sette WF; Mendoza CE; Beyer SV
Neurotoxicology; 1983; 4(4):85-97. PubMed ID: 6686874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pediatric obesity.
Kemper KJ
Explore (NY); 2009; 5(1):12. PubMed ID: 19114256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Why IRIS is outdated: an additional perspective.
Graham J
Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1411-2. PubMed ID: 17184385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. IRIS from the inside.
Mills A
Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1409-10; discussion 1413. PubMed ID: 17184384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk proposals of the 103rd Congress.
Paxman D
Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):245-67. PubMed ID: 8744601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's examination of its risk assessment principles and practices: a brief perspective from the regulated community.
Stahl RG; Guiseppi-Elie A; Bingman TS
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2005 Jan; 1(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16637153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sediment toxicity in Central and South Florida ecosystems.
Rand GM; Carriger JF; Lee TA; Pfeuffer RJ; Fink LE
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2003 Mar; 70(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 12592523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What we know about pesticides and breast cancer.
Steingraber S
Rev Environ Health; 2009; 24(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 20384044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Calculation of cancer risk.
Walker B
Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Jan; 105(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 9074866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Exaggerated risks of chemicals.
Abelson PH
J Clin Epidemiol; 1995 Feb; 48(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 7869063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
