BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8549890)

  • 1. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency dependence of binaural performance in listeners with impaired binaural hearing.
    Gabriel KJ; Koehnke J; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):336-47. PubMed ID: 1737882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of randomizing values of interaural disparities on binaural detection and on discrimination of interaural correlation.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Aug; 102(2 Pt 1):1113-20. PubMed ID: 9265758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No more than "slight" hearing loss and degradations in binaural processing.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2094. PubMed ID: 31046341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Spencer NJ; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1783. PubMed ID: 27914394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The measurement of the lateralization of narrow bands of noise using an acoustic pointing paradigm: the effect of sound-pressure level.
    Simon HJ; Collins CC; Jampolsky A; Morledge DE; Yu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1534-47. PubMed ID: 8176057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective measure of binaural processing: Acoustic change complex in response to interaural phase differences.
    Fan Y; Gifford RH
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109020. PubMed ID: 38763034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Smoski WJ; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 3711453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bronkhorst AW; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1374-83. PubMed ID: 2808911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance in several binaural-interaction experiments.
    Koehnke J; Colburn HS; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1558-62. PubMed ID: 3711455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.
    Strouse A; Ashmead DH; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2385-99. PubMed ID: 10491702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-individual differences in binaural detection of low-frequency or high-frequency tonal signals masked by narrow-band or broadband noise.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Hyde EL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2069-78. PubMed ID: 9566329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on interaural discrimination and virtual localization.
    Smith-Olinde L; Koehnke J; Besing J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2084-99. PubMed ID: 9566330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Staffel JG; Hall JW; Grose JH; Pillsbury HC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1720-7. PubMed ID: 2341676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Baltzell LS; Swaminathan J; Cho AY; Lavandier M; Best V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):1546. PubMed ID: 32237845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of interaural delay, center frequency, and no more than "slight" hearing loss on precision of binaural processing: Empirical data and quantitative modeling.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):292. PubMed ID: 30075692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.