These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8549897)

  • 1. Discrimination of multichannel-compressed speech in noise: long-term learning in hearing-impaired subjects.
    Yund EW; Buckles KM
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 8549897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of multichannel compression on vowel and stop-consonant discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Crain TR; Yund EW
    Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):529-43. PubMed ID: 8654908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise.
    Yund EW; Buckles KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1206-23. PubMed ID: 7876443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of multichannel compression/expansion amplification on the intelligibility of nonsense syllables in noise.
    Walker G; Byrne D; Dillon H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Sep; 76(3):746-57. PubMed ID: 6491047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW; Simon HJ; Efron R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Choi S; Hoover B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):483-94. PubMed ID: 17609611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced speech perception at low signal-to-noise ratios with multichannel compression hearing aids.
    Yund EW; Buckles KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1224-40. PubMed ID: 7876444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception in noise for children with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony type hearing loss.
    Rance G; Barker E; Mok M; Dowell R; Rincon A; Garratt R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 17485984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
    Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
    Alexander JM; Rallapalli V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing.
    Eisenberg LS; Dirks DD; Bell TS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):222-33. PubMed ID: 7731213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consonant recognition and confusion patterns among elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 3678640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.