These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8550400)

  • 1. Technical quality control in mammography screening: first results in Belgium.
    De Luyck I; Mol H; Van Loon R; Osteaux M
    J Belge Radiol; 1995 Oct; 78(5):311-2. PubMed ID: 8550400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two test-objects for daily quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening units.
    De Luyck I; Mol H; Van Loon R
    J Belge Radiol; 1996 Apr; 79(2):90. PubMed ID: 8767841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experience with the European quality assurance guidelines for digital mammography systems in a national screening programme.
    McCullagh J; Keavey E; Egan G; Phelan N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 23173219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bavarian mammography screening: results of consistency tests in X-ray units over three months].
    Blendl C; Klug A; Lohmann R; Moll C; Schädlich J; Blaser D
    Rofo; 2004 Aug; 176(8):1157-66. PubMed ID: 15346292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance in screening mammography.
    Health Devices; 1990; 19(5-6):152-98. PubMed ID: 2372321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation of a clinical quality control program in a mammography screening service of Brazil.
    DE Souza Sabino SM; Silva TB; Watanabe AH; Syrjänen K; Carvalho AL; Mauad EC
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Sep; 34(9):5057-65. PubMed ID: 25202091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality Controls in Digital Mammography protocol of the EFOMP Mammo Working group.
    Gennaro G; Avramova-Cholakova S; Azzalini A; Luisa Chapel M; Chevalier M; Ciraj O; de Las Heras H; Gershan V; Hemdal B; Keavey E; Lanconelli N; Menhart S; João Fartaria M; Pascoal A; Pedersen K; Rivetti S; Rossetti V; Semturs F; Sharp P; Torresin A
    Phys Med; 2018 Apr; 48():55-64. PubMed ID: 29728229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendations for a mammography quality assurance program.
    Craig AR; Heggie JC; McLean ID; Coakley KS; Nicoll JJ
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2001 Sep; 24(3):107-31. PubMed ID: 11764394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality control in mammography: practical implications.
    De Luyck I; Goes E; Mol H; Keymolen K; Van Loon R; Osteaux M
    J Belge Radiol; 1995 Feb; 78(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 7890590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality assurance of mammographic devices].
    Nowotny R; Semturs F
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(21-23):556-9. PubMed ID: 11762254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Film-screen combinations for mammography].
    Säbel M; Aichinger H
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 May; 1(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 1878377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(214):59750-1. PubMed ID: 10187387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography quality assurance from A to Z.
    Farria DM; Bassett LW; Kimme-Smith C; DeBruhl N
    Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):371-85. PubMed ID: 8190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guideline for determining the mean glandular dose according to DIN 6868-162 and threshold contrast visibility according to the quality assurance guideline for digital mammography systems.
    Sommer A; Schopphoven S; Land I; Blaser D; Sobczak T;
    Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 24557600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.