These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8550400)

  • 21. An alternative method for noise analysis using pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems.
    Bouwman R; Young K; Lazzari B; Ravaglia V; Broeders M; van Engen R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):6809-22. PubMed ID: 19847017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dose sensitivity of three phantoms used for quality assurance in digital mammography.
    Figl M; Semturs F; Kaar M; Hoffmann R; Kaldarar H; Homolka P; Mostbeck G; Scholz B; Hummel J
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(2):N13-23. PubMed ID: 23257608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) update--focusing on quality assurance.
    Butler PF
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):40-50. PubMed ID: 10181471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality control in mammography.
    Hendrick RE; Botsco M; Plott CM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The technical quality of mammography in centers participating in a regional breast cancer awareness program.
    Galkin BM; Feig SA; Muir HD
    Radiographics; 1988 Jan; 8(1):133-45. PubMed ID: 3353530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.
    McLean D; Eckert M; Heard R; Chan W
    Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative study of dose values and image quality in mammography in the Madrid area.
    Chevalier M; Morán P; Vañó E
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):42-8. PubMed ID: 8785620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Central online quality assurance in radiology: an IT solution exemplified by the German Breast Cancer Screening Program].
    Czwoydzinski J; Girnus R; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 21830180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A mammography quality assurance test program.
    Burgess A
    Radiology; 1979 Nov; 133(2):491-5. PubMed ID: 493542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancer screening--the European experience.
    Perry NM
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15633481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.
    Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R
    J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic unit compression force: acceptance test and quality control protocols.
    Tanner RL
    Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 1609101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [European recommendations for quality assurance in the setting of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Report of pathologists of the working group "Breast Cancer Screening" of the European Union].
    Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):315-33. PubMed ID: 9004719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality control in mammography: an initiative in France.
    Maccia C; Renaud R; Castellano S; Schaffer P; Wahl R; Haehnel P; Dale G; Gairard B
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):371-83. PubMed ID: 8173879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Quality control in mammography. 1. Status check].
    Hautmann J; Säbel M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jan; 41(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3344445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
    McLelland R; Hendrick RE; Zinninger MD; Wilcox PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Sep; 157(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 1872231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
    de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
    Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Strategies for implementation and quality assurance for mammographic screening.
    DeBruhl ND; Farria DM; Bassett LW
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Oct; 4(5):155-9. PubMed ID: 1343948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.