These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8550915)

  • 1. Accuracy of predicting genetic merit from pedigree information for bulls entering stud sampling programs.
    Samuelson DJ; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Sep; 78(9):2057-66. PubMed ID: 8550915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of most recent evaluations of Holstein bulls from first available pedigree information.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):670-6. PubMed ID: 11949873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships of productive life evaluations with changes in evaluations for yields.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT; Tabbaa MJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 11949874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictability of bull merit from genetic evaluations of sires and maternal grandsires using an animal model.
    Rekik B; Berger PJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 9178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heritability of changes in genetic evaluations of dairy bulls from first to later records of daughters.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 12018441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of maturity rate of daughters on genetic ranking of Holstein bulls.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Powell RL; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3337-45. PubMed ID: 16107424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of foreign dairy bull evaluations in predicting United States evaluations for yield.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2621-6. PubMed ID: 15328287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influences of progeny test programs on genetic evaluations of young sires.
    Vierhout CN; Cassell BG; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Sep; 81(9):2524-32. PubMed ID: 9785245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examination of more frequent genetic evaluations for dairy bulls.
    Powell RL; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Dec; 82(12):2766-70. PubMed ID: 10629824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of sampling status and adjustment for heterogeneous variance on bias in bull evaluations.
    Powell RL; Wiggans GR; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Mar; 77(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 8169296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of longevity breeding values for US Holstein sires using survival analysis methodology.
    Caraviello DZ; Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Oct; 87(10):3518-25. PubMed ID: 15377631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between individual herd-heritability estimates and sire misidentification rate.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD; Zwald NR; Cowan CM; Meland OM
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1640-7. PubMed ID: 18349256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating sire selection practices using lifetime net income functions.
    Cassell BG; Jobst SM; McGilliard ML; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Dec; 85(12):3492-502. PubMed ID: 12512623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stability of genetic evaluations for active artificial insemination bulls.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2614-20. PubMed ID: 15328286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection of bulls for progeny testing using pedigree indices and characteristics of potential bull-dams' herds.
    Mao IL; Dong MC; Meadows CE
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Aug; 74(8):2747-56. PubMed ID: 1918548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3444-7. PubMed ID: 22612979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of international dairy sire evaluations from meta-analysis of national estimated breeding values and direct analysis of individual animal performance records.
    Maltecca C; Bagnato A; Weigel KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2599-605. PubMed ID: 15328284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Animal model evaluations for Mexican Holsteins.
    Powell RL; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Apr; 74(4):1420-7. PubMed ID: 1860983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short communication: Composition of milk protein and milk fatty acids is stable for cows differing in genetic merit for milk production.
    Bobe G; Lindberg GL; Freeman AE; Beitz DC
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3955-60. PubMed ID: 17639007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.