BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8550945)

  • 1. Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Whitehead ML; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3200-14. PubMed ID: 8550945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.
    Whitehead ML; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2346-58. PubMed ID: 7714254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical significance of relative probe-tone levels on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Rasmussen AN; Popelka GR; Osterhammel PA; Nielsen LH
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 8146586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. I. Frequency effects.
    Lasky RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):981-91. PubMed ID: 9479751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
    Rogers AR; Burke SR; Kopun JG; Tan H; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.
    Reuven ML; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Rasetshwane DM; Allen JB; Tan H; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 24165303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans.
    Roede J; Harris FP; Probst R; Xu L
    Audiology; 1993; 32(5):273-81. PubMed ID: 8216026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space.
    Whitehead ML; Stagner BB; McCoy MJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2359-77. PubMed ID: 7714255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions measured as vibration on the eardrum of human subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Zenner HP; Gummer AW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jan; 104(5):1546-51. PubMed ID: 17242353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability.
    Scheperle RA; Neely ST; Kopun JG; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):288-300. PubMed ID: 18646977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
    Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.
    Richmond SA; Kopun JG; Neely ST; Tan H; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3134-40. PubMed ID: 21568416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM; Shaver MD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.
    Maxim T; Shera CA; Charaziak KK; Abdala C
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1345-1358. PubMed ID: 30882535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of Minor Conductive Hearing Loss in Humans Using Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Marcrum SC; Kummer P; Steffens T
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):391-398. PubMed ID: 28169838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationships among standard and wideband measures of middle ear function and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Schairer KS; Morrison B; Szewczyk E; Fowler CG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):253-64. PubMed ID: 21756841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.