These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8552522)

  • 1. Impedance to defibrillation countershock: does an optimal impedance exist?
    KenKnight BH; Eyüboğlu BM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Nov; 18(11):2068-87. PubMed ID: 8552522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Electrical defibrillation and cardioversion].
    Brazdzionyte J; Stanaitiene G; Ablonskyte-Dūdoniene R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2005; 41(10):892-9. PubMed ID: 16272838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transmyocardial impedance during single and multiple internal ventricular defibrillation shocks.
    Peters W; Solingen S; Kobayashi Y; Scharf R; Mandel WJ; Gang ES
    Am J Physiol; 1994 Aug; 267(2 Pt 2):H684-93. PubMed ID: 8067424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of low energy test shocks for estimation of cardiac and electrode impedance with implantable defibrillators.
    Leitch JW; Yee R; Klein GJ; Jones DL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Apr; 13(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 1692124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms delivered from various capacitances/pulse widths.
    Lin JH; Stotts LJ; Rosborough JP; Frederick H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):158-62. PubMed ID: 9121981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do some patients have high defibrillation thresholds at defibrillator implantation? Answers from basic research.
    Hillsley RE; Wharton JM; Cates AW; Wolf PD; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):222-39. PubMed ID: 7513408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of defibrillation efficacy between different impedance compensation techniques in high impedance porcine model.
    Li Y; Ristagno G; Yu T; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1312-7. PubMed ID: 19720442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of defibrillator-can size on defibrillation success with a single-lead unipolar system.
    Newby KH; Moredock L; Rembert J; Wharton JM; Natale A
    Am Heart J; 1996 Feb; 131(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 8579018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic adjustment of biphasic pulse duration in transthoracic defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Iliev I; Cansell A; Daskalov I
    J Med Eng Technol; 2000; 24(5):210-4. PubMed ID: 11204244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated precision current delivery: an alternative method for cardiac defibrillation.
    Zimmerman D; Farkhani F; Wesley RC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):595-602. PubMed ID: 7516543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transthoracic defibrillation: importance of avoiding electrode placement directly on the female breast.
    Pagan-Carlo LA; Spencer KT; Robertson CE; Dengler A; Birkett C; Kerber RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Feb; 27(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 8557919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of polarity reversal on defibrillation success with biphasic shocks and a transvenous/subcutaneous defibrillator system in a porcine animal model.
    Stellbrink C; Schauerte P; Loeser H; Rosenbaum C; Kuckertz E; Vogel M; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Schoendube FA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1435-41. PubMed ID: 9670188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low voltage shocks have a significantly higher tilt of the internal electric field than do high voltage shocks.
    Brewer JE; Tvedt MA; Adams TP; Kroll MW
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 2):214. PubMed ID: 7724402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of biphasic waveform pulse on endocardial defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Neuzner J; Pitschner HF; Huth C; Schlepper M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 7513406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energy levels for defibrillation: what is of real clinical importance?
    Fotuhi PC; Epstein AE; Ideker RE
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Mar; 83(5B):24D-33D. PubMed ID: 10089836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective evaluation of current-based impedance compensation defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Chen B; Yin C; Ristagno G; Quan W; Tan Q; Freeman G; Li Y
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 23000364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.
    Atkins DL; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 8008545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analog-digital recording of current and voltage during high voltage DC shocks.
    Peters W; Scharf R; Meesmann M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan; 18(1 Pt 2):208-13. PubMed ID: 7724401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution of the optimum bidirectional (+/- biphasic) wave for defibrillation.
    Geddes LA; Havel W
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000; 34(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 10690435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.