These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8552812)

  • 1. [Clinical usefulness of a computerized tomography study of morphology of the femoral canal in patients candidates for hip prosthesis].
    Nardis P; Bellelli A; Giannecchini S; Ghera S; Santori FS
    Radiol Med; 1995 Oct; 90(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 8552812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new technique for morphologic measurement of the femur. Its application for Japanese patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip.
    Miura T; Matsumoto T; Nishino M; Kaneuji A; Sugimori T; Tomita K
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1998; 57(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 9926259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized morphometric analysis of the femoral diaphyseal canal.
    Toni A; Fabbri F; Scimeca GB; Zanotti Russo MC; Baruffaldi F; Cianci R; Giunti A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1995; 80(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 7587522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Definition of a Novel Proximal Femur Classification in the Sagittal Plane According to the Femur Morphometric Analysis.
    Bozkurt M; Gursoy S; Shohat N; Simsek ME; Akkaya M; Parvizi J
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1502-1508. PubMed ID: 30954411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the canal flare index a reliable means of estimation of canal shape? Measurement of proximal femoral geometry by use of 3D models of the femur.
    Tawada K; Iguchi H; Tanaka N; Watanabe N; Murakami S; Hasegawa S; Otsuka T
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 May; 20(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 25740729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal.
    Laine HJ; Lehto MU; Moilanen T
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10654468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Design of cementless femoral prostheses adaptive to secondary osteoarthritis of the hip joint].
    Okumura Y; Imura S; Takedani H; Bou A
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 67(10):897-910. PubMed ID: 8263362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predisposing factors in fixation failure of femoral prostheses following primary Charnley low friction arthroplasty. A 10- to 20-year followup study.
    Kobayashi S; Eftekhar NS; Terayama K
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Sep; (306):73-83. PubMed ID: 8070214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement for ankylosing spondylitis.
    Yang P; Wang CS; Wang KZ; Shi ZB; Gong FL
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2005 Dec; 25(12):1468-73. PubMed ID: 16354607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral stem impaction grafting: extending the role of cement.
    Gehrke T; Gebauer M; Kendoff D
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):92-4. PubMed ID: 24187362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
    Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants.
    Adam F; Hammer DS; Pape D; Kohn D
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Jun; 122(5):262-8. PubMed ID: 12070644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of sliding-taper compared with composite-beam cemented femoral prosthesis loading regime on proximal femoral bone remodeling: a randomized clinical trial.
    Jayasuriya RL; Buckley SC; Hamer AJ; Kerry RM; Stockley I; Tomouk MW; Wilkinson JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jan; 95(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 23283370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
    Cech O; Dzupa V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The internal calcar septum and its contact with the virtual stem in THR: a computer tomographic evaluation.
    Decking J; Decking R; Schoellner C; Drees P; Eckardt A
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Oct; 74(5):542-6. PubMed ID: 14620973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Custom-made segmental femoral replacement prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Malkani AL; Sim FH; Chao EY
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):727-33. PubMed ID: 8414438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study.
    Pitto RP; Schramm M; Hohmann D; Schmidt R
    Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 12025051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.