These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8552977)

  • 21. Influence of amplification on the discrimination of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables in a population with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jacobson JT; McCandless GA; Mahoney TM
    Audiology; 1979; 18(6):522-36. PubMed ID: 526197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 10037062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of performance with wide dynamic range compression and linear amplification.
    Kam AC; Wong LL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Sep; 10(8):445-57. PubMed ID: 10813645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of a speech enhancement strategy with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Jamieson DG; Brennan RL; Cornelisse LE
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 7672476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations.
    John A; Wolfe J; Scollie S; Schafer E; Hudson M; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25514454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss.
    Hillock-Dunn A; Buss E; Duncan N; Roush PA; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 24496288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):400-11. PubMed ID: 9921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid.
    Moore BC; Stainsby TH; Alcántara JI; Kühnel V
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(7):399-409. PubMed ID: 15515639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consonant recognition performance of hearing-impaired listeners using one linear and three nonlinear hearing aids.
    Sammeth CA; Tetzeli M; Ochs MT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Aug; 7(4):240-50. PubMed ID: 8827918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Proportional frequency compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Hurtig RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):877-86. PubMed ID: 10462793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of compression ratio on speech recognition and speech-quality ratings with wide dynamic range compression amplification.
    Boike KT; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):456-68. PubMed ID: 10757696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
    Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
    Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.
    Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Hellman S; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 8549896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of automatic gain control in hearing-impaired listeners with different dynamic ranges.
    Peterson ME; Feeney MP; Yantis PA
    Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 2358128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.