94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8553039)
1. [The diagnosis of bone lesions with conventional x-ray images and with a direct digital procedure (RVG). An in-vitro study. RadioVisioGraphy].
Stassinakis A; Zeyer O; Brägger U
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(12):1539-45. PubMed ID: 8553039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging.
Tirrell BC; Miles DA; Brown CE; Legan JJ
J Endod; 1996 Feb; 22(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 8935022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging.
Stassinakis A; Brägger U; Stojanovic M; Bürgin W; Lussi A; Lang NP
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 9161167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions.
Furkart AJ; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Nummikoski P; Matteson S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Nov; 74(5):652-60. PubMed ID: 1437069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of induced mid-buccal/lingual alveolar bone defects.
Nair MK; Bezik J
J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1833-8. PubMed ID: 17076608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
Barbat J; Messer HH
J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detectability of experimental peri-implant cancellous bone lesions using conventional and direct digital radiography.
Kavadella A; Karayiannis A; Nicopoulou-Karayianni K
Aust Dent J; 2006 Jun; 51(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 16848268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of zoomed digital image in the detection of periodontal bone defect: in vitro study.
de Morais JA; Sakakura CE; Loffredo LC; Scaf G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16618844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions.
Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two imaging modalities: F-speed film and digital images for detection of osseous defects in patients with interdental vertical bone defects.
Jorgenson T; Masood F; Beckerley JM; Burgin C; Parker DE
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):500-5. PubMed ID: 18033948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selenium-based digital radiography in the detection of bone lesions: preliminary experience with experimentally created defects.
Ludwig K; Link TM; Fiebich M; Renger B; Diederich S; Oelerich M; Lenzen H; Heindel W
Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):220-4. PubMed ID: 10887251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiovisiography--a preliminary subjective assessment in a hospital paediatric dentistry department.
Russell M; Pitts NB
Int J Paediatr Dent; 1993 Jun; 3(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 8218115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception of image quality in direct digital radiography after application of various image treatment filters for detectability of dental disease.
Wenzel A; Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8299831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
