These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8553039)

  • 41. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
    Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 2082410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Diagnosis of gastric cancers: comparison of conventional radiography and digital radiography with a 4 million-pixel charge-coupled device.
    Iinuma G; Ushio K; Ishikawa T; Nawano S; Sekiguchi R; Satake M
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 10671599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of cathode ray tube display format on observer performance in dental digitized radiography: comparison with plain films.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 7835525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Digital luminescence radiography in comparison with the conventional film-screen technique in diagnosis of fractures].
    Fink U; Schwerdtfeger J; Fink BK; Schätzl M; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 8645859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparative study on diagnostic accuracy of colour coded digital images, direct digital images and conventional radiographs for periapical lesions - an in vitro study.
    Pati AR; Mubeen ; K R V; Bhuyan SK; Panigrahi RG; Priyadarshini SR; Misra S; Singh C
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Nov; 8(11):ZC55-9. PubMed ID: 25584318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An image plate system for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; Borg E; Tammisalo E
    Dent Update; 1996 Oct; 23(8):334-7. PubMed ID: 9452625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Detection of small lesions in alveolar bone by digital subtraction radiography.
    Ying SY; Chen X; Zhang G; Cao CF
    Chin J Dent Res; 1999 May; 2(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 10863402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review.
    Wenzel A
    Int Dent J; 1993 Apr; 43(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 8320010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of varying gray-scale resolution for detectability of bone lesions in intraoral radiographs digitized for teletransmission.
    Wenzel A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1987 Dec; 95(6):483-92. PubMed ID: 3480566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessment of using digital manipulation tools for diagnosing mandibular radiolucent lesions.
    Raitz R; Assunção Junior JN; Fenyo-Pereira M; Correa L; de Lima LP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Mar; 41(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 22116126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In vitro evaluation of the XR-15 portable x-ray unit for forensic odontology.
    Varghese S; Kimmel A; Radmer T; Bradley TG; Bahcall J
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2004 Jun; 22(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 16223025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [The reliability of apical x-ray pictures in the diagnosis of mandibular bone lesions. A review of the literature and in-vitro study].
    Briseño Marroquin B; Willershausen-Zönchen B; Pistorius A; Göller M
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(9):1142-8. PubMed ID: 7481701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Radiovisiography: an initial evaluation.
    Horner K; Shearer AC; Walker A; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 1990 Mar; 168(6):244-8. PubMed ID: 2182096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of simulated bone lesion in the head of the mandible by using multislice computed tomography.
    Utumi ER; Perrella A; Albuquerque MA; Adde CA; Rocha RG; Cavalcanti MG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 19936536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Application of digital radiography for measuring in clinical dental practice.
    Ilić DV; Stojanović L
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):16-22. PubMed ID: 25845247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiovisiography in the detection of periapical lesions.
    Sullivan JE; Di Fiore PM; Koerber A
    J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 11194362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sensor noise in direct digital imaging (the RadioVisioGraphy, Sens-a-Ray, and Visualix/Vixa systems) evaluated by subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 8108102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Digital imaging. A report on the 3rd Symposium on Digital Imaging in Dental Radiology of 13-15 October 1994 in Noordwijkerhout, the Netherlands].
    Bürgin W; Brägger U
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1995; 105(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 7878424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.