These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8553127)

  • 1. Biomechanical testing of the spine. Load-controlled versus displacement-controlled analysis.
    Goel VK; Wilder DG; Pope MH; Edwards WT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Nov; 20(21):2354-7. PubMed ID: 8553127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expanding our view of the spine system.
    Reeves NP; Cholewicki J
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Feb; 19(2):331-2. PubMed ID: 19946732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method for the identification of in-vivo segmental stiffness properties of the spine.
    Vanderby R; Daniele M; Patwardhan A; Bunch W
    J Biomech Eng; 1986 Nov; 108(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 3795875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neutral spine principle.
    Wallden M
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2009 Oct; 13(4):350-61. PubMed ID: 19761959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging of the weight-bearing spine.
    Weishaupt D; Boxheimer L
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2003 Dec; 7(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 14735426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spine biomechanics.
    Adams MA; Dolan P
    J Biomech; 2005 Oct; 38(10):1972-83. PubMed ID: 15936025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spinal surgery: the past century and the next.
    Theodore N; Sonntag VK
    Neurosurgery; 2000 Apr; 46(4):767-77. PubMed ID: 10764249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardized provocation of lumbar spine mobility: three methods compared by radiostereometric analysis.
    Axelsson P; Karlsson BS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(7):792-7. PubMed ID: 15803083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pure shear properties of lumbar spinal joints and the effect of tissue sectioning on load sharing.
    Lu WW; Luk KD; Holmes AD; Cheung KM; Leong JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):E204-9. PubMed ID: 15834318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data.
    Wilke HJ; Krischak ST; Wenger KH; Claes LE
    Eur Spine J; 1997; 6(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 9209882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and validation of a novel Cartesian biomechanical testing system with coordinated 6DOF real-time load control: application to the lumbar spine (L1-S, L4-L5).
    Kelly BP; Bennett CR
    J Biomech; 2013 Jul; 46(11):1948-54. PubMed ID: 23764173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method to approximate load-displacement relationships of spinal motion segments for patient-specific multi-body models of scoliotic spine.
    Jalalian A; Tay FEH; Arastehfar S; Liu G
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Jun; 55(6):1039-1050. PubMed ID: 27669701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The essentials of spine biomechanics for the general neurosurgeon.
    Benzel EC
    Clin Neurosurg; 2003; 50():86-177. PubMed ID: 14677437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of pushing exercises: muscle activity and spine load while contrasting techniques on stable surfaces with a labile suspension strap training system.
    McGill SM; Cannon J; Andersen JT
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Jan; 28(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 24088865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The load on the spinal column in handling of burdens].
    Jäger M; Luttmann A; Laurig W
    Orthopade; 1990 Jun; 19(3):132-9. PubMed ID: 2374690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation.
    Barrey C; Rousseau MA; Persohn S; Campana S; Perrin G; Skalli W
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():S155-65. PubMed ID: 25845316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
    Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation techniques in a calf spine model.
    Lebwohl NH; Cunningham BW; Dmitriev A; Shimamoto N; Gooch L; Devlin V; Boachie-Adjei O; Wagner TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(21):2312-20. PubMed ID: 12438978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trunk response to sudden forward perturbations - effects of preload and sudden load magnitudes, posture and abdominal antagonistic activation.
    Shahvarpour A; Shirazi-Adl A; Mecheri H; Larivière C
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2014 Jun; 24(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 24726611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining 3D tracking and surgical instrumentation to determine the stiffness of spinal motion segments: a validation study.
    Reutlinger C; Gédet P; Büchler P; Kowal J; Rudolph T; Burger J; Scheffler K; Hasler C
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Apr; 33(3):340-6. PubMed ID: 21130015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.