These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8554891)

  • 1. [Contribution of a new technique of digital enhancement for the control of radiation fields].
    Giraud P; Caselles O; Duthil P; Alzieu C; Lucot H; Daly-Schveitzer N
    Bull Cancer Radiother; 1995; 82(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 8554891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Portal film enhancement: technique and clinical utility.
    Rosenman J; Roe CA; Cromartie R; Muller KE; Pizer SM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Jan; 25(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 8420883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic digital contrast enhancement of radiotherapy films.
    Sherouse GW; Rosenman J; McMurry HL; Pizer SM; Chaney EL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1987 May; 13(5):801-6. PubMed ID: 3570904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Monitor assessment of digitalized and post-processed portal films compared to conventional films presented on a light box].
    Wachter S; Gerstner N; Colotto A; Battmann A; Gahleitner A; Haverkamp U; Pötter R
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1998 Nov; 174(11):589-96. PubMed ID: 9830441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital image processing of radiation therapy portal films.
    Cumberlin RL; Rodgers JE; Fahey FH
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1989; 13(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 2655877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative assessment of quality of digitized portal images: receiver operating characteristic analysis applied to imaging in radiation therapy.
    Okajima K; Nakata M; Yano S; Nagata Y; Kimura I; Nakano Y; Abe M
    Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):273-6. PubMed ID: 1909447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of analog contrast enhancement and digital unsharp masking in low-contrast portal images.
    Weiser JC; Gur D; Gennari RC; Deutsch M
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 2308541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Irradiation field controls by digital luminescence radiography].
    John V; Müller RD; Feldmann HJ; Oezgür B; Budach V
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1992 May; 168(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 1598664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The new possibilities of digital luminescence radiography (DLR) and digital imaging data processing for the making of field verification images].
    Zimmermann JS; Blume J; Wendhausen H; Hebbinghaus D; Kovács G; Eilf K; Schultze J; Kimmig BN
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1995 Jun; 171(6):332-9. PubMed ID: 7597619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative image quality evaluation of pelvic computed tomography-based imaging systems: a novel concept in radiotherapy.
    Behrens CF; Andreasen TB; Lindberg H; Buhl SK; Vestergaard A; Elstrøm UV; Sjöström D
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Oct; 52(7):1579-82. PubMed ID: 24024695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A digital fluoroscopic imaging system for verification during external beam radiotherapy].
    Takai M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 2247353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study on the efficacy of digital enhancement of on-line portal images.
    Leszczynski KW; Shalev S; Ryder S
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):999-1005. PubMed ID: 1518489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital radiography in urography].
    Salvini E; Abbona M; Barigozzi P; Favini G; Pedroli G; Crespi A; Pastori R; Cerutti R; Stacul F
    Radiol Med; 1989; 77(1-2):44-50. PubMed ID: 2928564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The physicotechnical support of radiation diagnosis and therapy].
    Blinov NN; Gurvich AM; Kostylev VA; Leonov BI
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1990 Oct; 35(10):16-21. PubMed ID: 2233161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On-line portal imaging: image quality defining parameters for pelvic fields--a clinical evaluation.
    Verellen D; De Neve W; Van den Heuvel F; Coghe M; Louis O; Storme G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Nov; 27(4):945-52. PubMed ID: 8244827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observer study involving laser-digitized versus CCD-digitized images.
    Clark KW; Dawson WB; Muka E; Pilgram TK; Blaine GJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():53-6. PubMed ID: 12105697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A digital image processing system for high energy X-ray portal images.
    Leong J
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 Dec; 29(12):1527-35. PubMed ID: 6440157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Application of digital images in quality assurance of radiotherapy].
    Jiang R; Li B; Fu S
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 34(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 20540302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.