105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8555373)
1. In vitro bromodeoxyuridine-labelling of single cell suspensions: effects of time and temperature of sample storage.
Carbajo-Pérez E; Carbajo S; Ciudad J; López A; Dolbeare F; Orfao A
Cell Prolif; 1995 Nov; 28(11):609-15. PubMed ID: 8555373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Vindelov et al. and bromodeoxyuridine/DNA double-staining flow cytometry methods for analysis of cell cycle distribution in rat thymocytes.
Orfao A; Carbajo S; Dolbeare F; Ciudad J; Lopez A; Carbajo-Perez E
Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 25(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 8875060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flow cytometric measurement of cell cycle kinetics in rat Walker-256 carcinoma following in vivo and in vitro pulse labelling with bromodeoxyuridine.
Fogt F; Wan J; O'Hara C; Bistrian BR; Blackburn GL; Istfan NW
Cytometry; 1991; 12(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 1825629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abnormal DNA synthesis in polyamine deficient cells revealed by bromodeoxyuridine-flow cytometry technique.
Fredlund JO; Johansson M; Baldetorp B; Oredsson SM
Cell Prolif; 1994 May; 27(5):243-56. PubMed ID: 10465009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The labelling index of human and mouse tumours assessed by bromodeoxyuridine staining in vitro and in vivo and flow cytometry.
Wilson GD; McNally NJ; Dunphy E; Kärcher H; Pfragner R
Cytometry; 1985 Nov; 6(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 4064843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-labelling index of rat thymus: influence of different BrdU doses and exposure times as analyzed both in tissue sections and in single cell suspensions.
Carbajo S; Orfao A; Alberca V; Ciudad J; López A; Hernández LC; Carbajo-Pérez E
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Jan; 8(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 7734409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of BrdUrd and [3H]TdR incorporation to estimate cell proliferation, cell loss, and potential doubling time in tumor xenografts.
Zätterström UK; Johansson M; Källén A; Baldetorp B; Oredsson S; Wennerberg J; Killander D
Cytometry; 1992; 13(8):872-9. PubMed ID: 1459003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate bromodeoxyuridine labelling of unseparated human bone marrow cells ex vivo is superior to labelling after routine laboratory processing.
Jensen PO; Mortensen BT; Christensen IJ; Larsen JK
Cell Prolif; 1998 Feb; 31(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9666814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow cytometric BrdUrd-pulse-chase study of heat-induced cell-cycle progression delays.
Higashikubo R; White RA; Roti Roti JL
Cell Prolif; 1993 Jul; 26(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 8343562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flow cytometric BrdUrd-pulse-chase study of X-ray-induced alterations in cell cycle progression.
Higashikubo R; Ragouzis M; Roti Roti JL
Cell Prolif; 1996 Jan; 29(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 8603109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunocytochemical detection of active DNA synthesis by in vivo labelling with anti-bromodeoxyuridine antibodies in glomeruli of rats with nephrotoxic serum nephritis.
Kubota T; Yoshizawa N
Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi; 1994 Nov; 36(11):1221-7. PubMed ID: 7853753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intratumoral heterogeneity of S phase transition in solid tumours determined by bromodeoxyuridine labelling and flow cytometry.
Baisch H; Otto U
Cell Prolif; 1993 Sep; 26(5):439-48. PubMed ID: 9087534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kinetic heterogeneity of an experimental tumour revealed by BrdUrd incorporation and mathematical modelling.
Bertuzzi A; Faretta M; Gandolfi A; Sinisgalli C; Starace G; Valoti G; Ubezio P
Bull Math Biol; 2002 Mar; 64(2):355-84. PubMed ID: 11926121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) staining and BrdUrd-labelling index under different proliferative conditions in vitro by flow cytometry.
Lohr F; Wenz F; Haas S; Flentje M
Cell Prolif; 1995 Feb; 28(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 7893842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method to estimate cell cycle time and growth fraction using bromodeoxyuridine-flow cytometry data from a single sample.
Eidukevicius R; Characiejus D; Janavicius R; Kazlauskaite N; Pasukoniene V; Mauricas M; Den Otter W
BMC Cancer; 2005 Sep; 5():122. PubMed ID: 16176590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cell kinetics in mouse epidermis studied by bivariate DNA/bromodeoxyuridine and DNA/keratin flow cytometry.
Kirkhus B; Clausen OP
Cytometry; 1990; 11(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 1690627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow cytometric estimation of cell cycle parameters using a monoclonal antibody to bromodeoxyuridine.
Sasaki K; Murakami T; Ogino T; Takahashi M; Kawasaki S
Cytometry; 1986 Jul; 7(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 3089742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bivariate flow cytometry DNA/BrdUrd analysis of plant cell cycle.
Lucretti S; Nardi L; Nisini PT; Moretti F; Gualberti G; Dolezel J
Methods Cell Sci; 1999; 21(2-3):155-66. PubMed ID: 10728648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Heterogeneous cell kinetics in tumors analyzed with a simulation model for bromodeoxyuridine single and multiple labeling.
Baisch H; Otto U; Hatje U; Fack H
Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 21(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 8529471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell kinetics in human malignancies studied with in vivo administration of bromodeoxyuridine and flow cytometry.
Riccardi A; Danova M; Wilson G; Ucci G; Dörmer P; Mazzini G; Brugnatelli S; Girino M; McNally NJ; Ascari E
Cancer Res; 1988 Nov; 48(21):6238-45. PubMed ID: 3167869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]