BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8556463)

  • 1. Current trends in radiographic caries imaging.
    Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Nov; 80(5):527-39. PubMed ID: 8556463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions.
    Wenzel A
    J Dent Res; 2004; 83 Spec No C():C72-5. PubMed ID: 15286126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The effect of the risk of a complaint on treatment decision making. An explorative investigation in fourth-year dental students].
    Verweij AM; van der Wel MW; Mileman PA; den Dekker J; van den Hout WB
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2009 Mar; 116(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 19382539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Establishment and evaluation of a computer-based software system for detection of initial approximal caries].
    Li Y; Ye WP; Li YJ; Yu Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 41(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 16777025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of bitewing radiographs in the management of dental caries: scientific and practical considerations.
    Pitts NB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 9084279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentists' variability in restorative decisions, microscopic and radiographic caries depth.
    Lewis DW; Kay EJ; Main PA; Pharoah MG; Csima A
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1996 Apr; 24(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 8654029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of additional teaching of final-year dental students on their radiographic diagnosis of caries.
    Wrbas KT; Kielbassa AM; Schulte-Mönting J; Hellwig E
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2000 Aug; 4(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11168478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) of previously sealed carious teeth: a pilot study.
    Briley JB; Dove SB; Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Hermesch CB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):105-14. PubMed ID: 9484148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M; Pitts NB
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries: effect of X-ray beam factors on diagnosis.
    Ricketts D; Kidd E; Smith B; Wilson R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 8603138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of tube voltage on radiographic diagnosis of caries in premolars and molars.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 1767370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'The prescription and timing of bitewing radiography in the diagnosis and management of dental caries: contemporary recommendations'.
    Gooda SA
    Br Dent J; 1992 Jun; 172(11):398. PubMed ID: 1622668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.
    Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 11385199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs.
    Aps JK; Berkhout E; Goren AD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):320; author reply 321. PubMed ID: 20587657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA; Makins SR; Bretz WA
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.
    Ludlow JB; Abreu M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10202475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TACT imaging of primary caries.
    Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The diagnosis of dental caries: 3. Rationale and overview of present and possible future techniques.
    Pitts NB
    Dent Update; 1992; 19(1):32, 34, 37-8, possim. PubMed ID: 1291356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.