These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8556728)

  • 1. A cerebrospinal fluid shunt: a theoretical concept.
    Magram G
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1995 Oct; 11(10):604-6. PubMed ID: 8556728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risks of using siphon-reducing devices.
    Kremer P; Aschoff A; Kunze S
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1994 May; 10(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 7923232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to get rid of the shunt: a comment.
    Epstein FJ
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1994 Jul; 10(5):342-3. PubMed ID: 7954506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explanted shunt valves: factors contributing to their failure.
    Brydon HL; Bayston R; Hayward RD; Harkness WF
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1994 Dec; 4 Suppl 1():37-8. PubMed ID: 7766553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the distal double-slit valve system in children with hydrocephalus.
    Hahn YS
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1994 Mar; 10(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 8033170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A search for determinants of cerebrospinal fluid shunt survival: retrospective analysis of a 14-year institutional experience.
    Piatt JH; Carlson CV
    Pediatr Neurosurg; 1993; 19(5):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 8398847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the best cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design: the pediatric valve design trial.
    Drake JM; Kestle JT
    Neurosurgery; 1998 Nov; 43(5):1259-60. PubMed ID: 9802875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the Effects of Cerebrospinal Fluid Protein Content on the Performance of Differential Pressure Valves and Antisiphon Devices Using a Novel Benchtop Shunting Model.
    Gorelick NL; Serra R; Iyer R; Um R; Grewal A; Monroe A; Antoine H; Beharry K; Cecia A; Kroll F; Ishida W; Perdomo-Pantoja A; Xu R; Loth F; Ye X; Suk I; Tyler B; Bayston R; Luciano MG
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Oct; 87(5):1046-1054. PubMed ID: 32521017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shunted hydrocephalus: normal upright ICP by CSF gravity-flow control. A clinical study in young adults.
    Foltz EL; Blanks J; Meyer R
    Surg Neurol; 1993 Mar; 39(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 8456385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part II: overdrainage, loculation, and abdominal complications.
    Browd SR; Gottfried ON; Ragel BT; Kestle JR
    Pediatr Neurol; 2006 Mar; 34(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 16504785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change in ventricular size and effect of ventricular catheter placement in pediatric patients with shunted hydrocephalus.
    Tuli S; O'Hayon B; Drake J; Clarke M; Kestle J
    Neurosurgery; 1999 Dec; 45(6):1329-33; discussion 1333-5. PubMed ID: 10598700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rationale and methodology of the multicenter pediatric cerebrospinal fluid shunt design trial. Pediatric Hydrocephalus Treatment Evaluation Group.
    Drake JM; Kestle J
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1996 Aug; 12(8):434-47. PubMed ID: 8891361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus.
    Drake JM; Kestle JR; Milner R; Cinalli G; Boop F; Piatt J; Haines S; Schiff SJ; Cochrane DD; Steinbok P; MacNeil N
    Neurosurgery; 1998 Aug; 43(2):294-303; discussion 303-5. PubMed ID: 9696082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hydrodynamic properties of hydrocephalus shunts.
    Czosnyka Z; Czosnyka M; Richards H; Pickard JD
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1998; 71():334-9. PubMed ID: 9779223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The CSF accumulator: its role in the central nervous system and implications for advancing hydrocephalus shunt technology.
    Magram G; Liakos AM
    Pediatr Neurosurg; 1997 May; 26(5):236-46. PubMed ID: 9440493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to get rid of the shunt: a comment.
    Haase J
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1994 Jul; 10(5):340-1. PubMed ID: 7954505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term survival rates of gravity-assisted, adjustable differential pressure valves in infants with hydrocephalus.
    Gebert AF; Schulz M; Schwarz K; Thomale UW
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2016 May; 17(5):544-51. PubMed ID: 26799410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shunt removal or replacement based on intraventricular infusion tests.
    Lundar T
    Childs Nerv Syst; 1994 Jul; 10(5):337-9. PubMed ID: 7954504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency and causes of shunt revisions in different cerebrospinal fluid shunt types.
    Borgbjerg BM; Gjerris F; Albeck MJ; Hauerberg J; Børgesen SE
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1995; 136(3-4):189-94. PubMed ID: 8748853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A physical framework for implementing virtual models of intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus shunt testing.
    Venkataraman P; Browd SR; Lutz BR
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2016 Sep; 18(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 27203135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.